Since, being “Asian-influenced,” we might have a blatant or implicit tendency to often work from a position of strength and power, (rather than from a position of weakness and vulnerability), which is quite contrary to Christ on the cross dying in weakness and helplessness.
]]>http://inheritancemag.com/themes/expanding-the-circle-of-fellowship/
enjoy!
As you rightly thank God for more than gratiously blessing UBF for the last 50 years, so do many of us. Thank God especially for calling Dr. Lee, Mother Barry, and the founding members of UBF from the early 1960s to serve God’s world mission purpose.
The point you raised from Newbigin’s Open Secret (which I have not read) is excellent: Responsibility must always follow privilege. Yet, sadly, because we are sinful, the Jews and we Christians incline toward emphasizing privilege while minimizing responsibility, or ignoring it altogether. Woe to us for doing so, for which we Christians constantly need Jesus’ mercy and grace, along with his discipline and judgment.
I thus fully agree with you regarding the sin of complacency, and of our ever constant need to grow in the “healthy tension between privileges and responsibility.” However, I would like to suggest that as much as complacency is a sin, but so is self-righteousness if we over-emphasize our need for being responsible. Our sense of responsibility can then easily degenerate into a man centered and man generated human effort that obscures the marvellous grace of Jesus.
In a sense, the Pharisees and religious leaders of Jesus’ day were actually very responsible to ensure the keeping of the law. But although they studied and “knew” the Bible more than anyone else, they completely missed the point (John 5:39). Likewise, I think that in our zeal to be responsible to keep our “UBF spiritual legacy,” we might be in danger of also missing the point if we primarily emphasize “UBF principles and practices” to the next UBF generation, as Joe pointed out.
]]>I have the same concern and apprehension as Joe, if we are indeed trying to pass on our “spiritual heritage” and “UBF principles” to the next generation. This, I think, would be how our first generation of UBF members lived out their Christian life.
God does whatever pleases HIMSELF (Ps 115:3; 135:6). The wind blows wherever it pleases (John 3:8). Man can never be the determiner of what is passed on to the next generation.
We, as Christians, are primarily called to realize and receive his indescribable gift (2 Cor 9:15), which is the gospel of God’s grace (Acts 20:24), and then to share this very gospel to the world, including the next generation.
I do not believe that we Christians are called to share our methodologies, principles, or any church or denominational legacy or heritage. What do you think?
]]>Indeed, holding a very denomination centric view can lead to some individuals to practically value their own denominations stance (and the cultural framework that shaped that stance) above what the bible (e.g., ban on music, drinking, smoking etc..) or Holy Spirit. And what kills me is that it is always the Holy Spirit that apparently justifies this. Should we X yes or no? One guy says the Holy Spirit says yes, the other one says the Holy Spirit says no. This is strange as I do not know any denominations that claim to hold infallible interpreters of the Bible. So while there are no explicit infallible interpreters, you have people who practically act as if they infallible on an implicit level which leads to self righteousnesses.
I think you put it well once before when you said what we need is humility. It shows a lack of humility to be able to look at a fellow Christian and with all the confidence that the world can offer, say to him, “You are not Christian” or, “You are going to Hell”, or “You are not saved unless you attend my particular denomination”.
One of my favorite stories related to this is in regards to a fiery priest in Baltimore during the 60s. He was preaching that protestants are not Christians and that they are going to hell and that there is no Salvation unless you are Catholic. The Church responded to this matter not simply by reprimanding the priest but also by releasing a papal encyclical titled Lumen Gentium. =)
]]>