Hi Maria, Dr. James. Thanks for responding.
I fully agree that focusing on Christ is the absolute key to Christian life and church life. It is surely the key to love, joy, peace, unity, forgiveness, reconciliation, etc. But the obvious fact is that sin still happens, and problems do happen in life and in the church. Let me illustrate by posing some questions:
If your wife commits adultery (God forbid), does the couple just focus on the good times and the honeymoon, and not address the reasons for the adultery?
If your daughter is taking drugs, do the parents just focus on how cute she was as a baby, and not address her destructive lifestyle?
If people are hurt by the church, and leaving the church, because of leadership issues and doctrinal and teaching issues, do we just focus on Jesus and NOT address the reasons and the causes behind the people that we have hurt and wounded? (Unless we think that the we have not wounded anyone, and that it is always the problem of the people who have left the church, or “gone out to pioneer,” and never the problem with the leadership.)
As an example of recent church abuses, it’s like saying that we should just focus on Jesus and on all the good that a pedophile priest has done in the past, and ignore his predatory sexual sins.
My contention is simply this: It is only because we focus on Jesus and his totally undeserved mercy and grace that we, as mature Christians, should be able to practically address painful and uncomfortable and ongoing issues and problems that we may have “buried” for decades as a church.
I’m not saying this is easy or painless for anyone. But saying, “Just pray,” or “Just trust God,” or even “Just focus on Jesus,” and NOT addressing the reality that is happening around us, is this biblical? Or is it reductionistic, simplistic, immature, unhealthy, and even “bad Bible study”? The whole Old and New Testament is full of “Christian people” problems in Israel and in the church. The Bible also contains countless practical guidelines for addressing them, some of which I have highlighted, proposed and suggested in my 3 articles.
It’s because a husband truly loves and forgives his adulterous wife, that he is able to humbly and gently address her sin of adultery with love, mercy, grace, forgiveness and with reconciliation in mind.
It is because parents love their drug addicted daughter that they unconditionally love her while attempting to do everything in their power to patiently resolve her drug addiction.
Shouldn’t we begin to do the same as a church?
]]>It is surely absolutely true and marvellous and beautiful and miraculous that, only by the grace of God, we proud sinful humans and natural enemies can be truly united in Christ, in spite of ourselves. We can be united and loving and supportive and gracious toward one another, even when we disagree, and even after we sin against each other, and even when we act and speak and blog and make decisions that may be regarded as political, or self-propagating, or non-Christian. As you said earlier, loving each other in the church is akin to loving our spouses when (not if) we get into a spat.
But the purpose of my 3 articles on this uncomfortable topic of “divisions in the church” is to begin to address the conflicts and issues that have obviously been happening for quite some time now through out the UBF world, beginning from Korea to Chicago/U.S. to Europe, etc. Denying that we have any interpersonal and authoritarian problems in our church when many people have already been hurt and wounded does not speak well for us as a church, especially if we keep defending our policies or not addressing the problem.
My major contention is that if we do not begin to address them prayerfully and humbly in honest open respectful communication that is visible and transparent to the whole church, we are not being trinitarian and relational like the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and thus not pleasing to God.
]]>Regarding hierarchy, there is surely leadership in the church. But the purpose of leadership is to preach the gospel, not lord it over others, and to “wash the stinky feet of others” (John 13:14-15). Probably, Jesus won’t mind if you hold your breadth while doing so! But do smile while holding your breadth :)
Yeah, acting as though the church (and the “sheep”) belongs to the leader or to the pastor, is something I am still trying to analyze and figure out, so that I might be able to articulate it in an understandable way. I’m not there yet. Maybe, you can help me out.
]]>conflict between Christians and “attacking” other Christians or churches is horrible and it surely grieves God,
being in Christ enables us Christians to transcend our differences and grow in the love of God and in understanding others,
God blessing our ministry despite our impure motives (Phil 1:18),
focusing on loving God and loving our neighbor (Matt 22:37-40),
becoming like the one we hate, likely without realizing it (Moby Dick), and
being an offender of what I myself hate in myself.
I hope I have correctly understood correctly tabulated the great points you mentioned. Surely, without the marvelous grace of Jesus, we’re all screwed…oops, sorry, I mean we’re all in big trouble, especially yours truly!
]]>Church life is full of meetings: business meetings, prayer meetings, fellowship meetings, Bible studies, etc. Many words are spoken at these meetings. But the words being spoken are often of a very limited scope and fail to reveal what people are truly thinking and feeling. Because of the way that the group dynamics work in our ministry, it is often the case that the senior people (usually the oldest males) say a lot, and others tend to be quiet. There is an unspoken but very real box that limits the discussion to certain topics that are considered acceptable, and stepping outside that box results in disapproving glances, silence, rebuke, etc. After the meeting, the senior people may think, “My, my, that meeting went well!” because they felt free to say whatever they wanted, but others weren’t free at all. The communication that took place was unidirectional and unilateral. The leader doesn’t see the problem, because he ran the show, and it went pretty much the way he wanted. From his perspective, everything is wonderful. Unless the leader is able to empathize and see what is happening from the perspective of others, he literally has no idea how poor the communication has become.
Speaking for myself, I have run many meetings where I have unwittingly stifled communication, cut people off, belittled them, made them feel stupid, failed to listen, never made them comfortable enough to open up and say what is on their minds. I am sorry about this. It is something that I need to work on.
And I have attended many meetings where the person who is leading the meeting has stifled communication. He may think he is doing a great job, showing godly leadership, etc. when he is merely acting like a bully. When this happens in a group setting, I feel terrible and want to do something about it. If the person leading the meeting is acting like a bully, what should I do? Some would say, “Wait until after the meeting and then tell him privately.” But if I wait until after the meeting, the damage has been done. If boorish behavior is happening in a group setting, shouldn’t that behavior sometimes be challenged in the same group setting? Helping a leader to save face should not always take precedence over everything else. I don’t think that saving face is the supreme value that must be upheld at all costs.
]]>