So many people have the wrong notion that love is the foundation, which sustains the marriage covenant. But it is just the other way round: the covenant sustains the love relationship. Love comes and goes and feelings come and go whereas the covenant stays. Thus the covenant is the ground upon which husband and wife can fall in love, again and again.
]]>It is the same with the marriage covenant, I believe. Religion would say, “I must love my wife, then God will bless my marriage.” But the Gospel says, “God has already blessed my marriage through Christ, therefore I love my wife.” Though quite subtle, I think that it makes a world of difference.
Experiencially, it is true for me. When I reflect upon the Cross and the depth of God’s love for me through Christ inspite of all my sins, then love for my wife and others spring forth, not from me, but by God’s transforming Grace in my heart.
]]>Be warned though, it is giving from a Catholic angle so watch out! =P
Also, when we think about the word “love” we all recognize what it is to one degree or another, Christian or non-Christian alike, because everyone is made in God’s image. So even non-believers have the capacity to love, even if they do not fully understand it the way a Christian does.
Consider this: To say, “I love pizza,” is not the same as saying, “I love my wife” (at least it should not be the same); but they are both love. Of course, the Greeks had four different words for “love” to differentiate those kinds of nuances, but at the core, all four words expressed a certain common theme. So maybe when the non-Christian expresses love for his spouse, he has only a limited understanding of what that means, whereas the Christian understands something more.
]]>Such non-Christian couples will be much happier than a Christian husband who absolutely applies Ephesians 5:22 to his wife!!!
]]>Yes, I do remember your presentation at West Loop a couple of years back. I don’t think I was weirded out by it, at least not that I can remember. Yes, for sure, we need more frank, open discussions about sexuality. I always say that sex is not dirty. It never was. It is the context of sex that may strip sex of its beauty, majesty and mystery.
I remember a title of a book I did not read which might allude to our topic of sexuality: http://www.desiringgod.org/resource-library/online-books/sex-and-the-supremacy-of-christ. It says, “The contributors to this unique volume invite you to both celebrate sex for what God made it to be and fight what sin has turned it into. Their hope is that this volume will help you orient your entire life and worldview—including your sex life and views on sexuality—around the glory of God in Christ.”
]]>Indeed! This is what I tried to get across during the UBF discussion on pre-marital sex. Sorry if I weirded you or the other parents with my topic. My point was to emphasize that if marriage is akin to the way Christ loves us, then there are certain principles that follow which can guide our view of human sexuality. For me these include marriage being for the purpose of creating life through Love just as Christ creates life in us through his Love. It means giving yourself completely to your spouse in the marital embrace just as Christ gave himself completely when he died on the cross. It means remaining faithful to your spouse just as Christ is faithful to us. It means forbidding divorce of a legitimate marriage since Christ would never divorce us. I guess my spirit is very much moved by John Paul’s theology of the body. Particularly his ability to carry an analogy to its logical end.
Human sexual intimacy is such a powerful mystery. It is the vehicle of commitment, self giving and openness that metaphoricly and literally creates Life. I feel like more spiritual discussion of sexual intimacy is lacking from pulpits.
]]>That being said, nothing is wrong with married people being missionaries or serving in Christ’s world “mission” together, but I just think that marriage is PRIMARILY a gift from God to us so that we would not be lonely and also type or shadow of our relationship with Christ as His bride. And He uses marriage as a tool for sanctification and preparation for the Kingdom of Heaven.
]]>I still cry over the “Plan B” part!
Phil Vassar, “Just Another Day In Paradise”
]]>
Anyway, I hate dancing, so no dancing was fine with me! And I personally don’t like ceremonies, so to me (perhaps as a man) the loss of American traditions in the wedding ceremony was no big deal.
But those things caused a HUGE amount of psychological grief to people, some of which continues to be a sore spot even today (brides and mothers-of-the-brides especially). Fortunately, God’s grace to us was that both my parents and my wife’s parents have a solid faith and love to see beyond these kinds of issues. But others didn’t fare so well.
I think any church needs to be considerate of culture issues when it comes to marriage. Why tear down American traditions for the sake of Korean-ized ceremonies that are presented as “gospel truth”?
]]>Darren, please send me email or contact me from my blog. There is an odd email address in your profile. Perhaps you are posting from a different email address, so that’s why you don’t get “Author” permissions.
]]>