1) Be afraid, be very afraid that everyone is betraying you.
2) Manage by fear. Make people afraid of you, so they won’t rebel.
3) Kill the talent. Don’t allow subordinates to realize and use their talents and gifts. They might overshadow the leader!
4) Rotate your favorites quickly. I had a teacher who would favor a student and then after the student began to flourish, she would tear that student down. By making what it takes to stay on her good side hard to discern, she kept students thinking about ways to curry her favor. Stalin made sure that everyone near him knew that they could be gone tomorrow or more powerful than they dared dream. It all depended on his will.
5) Create a cult of personality. Stalin turned Russia into Stalin’s Russia.
6) Rewrite the history of your project constantly to maximize your role. Everything revolved around the leader’s whims and directives.
]]>I cam across a related article. Are we raising Stalin-like leaders at ubf?
]]>“Leadership is not about a position, an office, or a title, it is influence. Leadership is not functioning as a delegated decision-maker for an absentee King. We are servants that distribute empowerment rather than delegate it. Leadership is all about connecting people to the King and allowing them to listen and follow His word. We do not need more servant leaders; we need more servants…period. Many leaders don’t mind being called a servant; they just don’t like being treated like one.”
]]>The interesting thing about the “Top-down” leadership is how ultimately ineffective it is. This type of leadership paralyzes a ministry. It results in a congregation where none of the individual members can make their own decisions and lack innovation/initiative. It is a stagnant ministry. Jesus was never a “one-man show.”
I like this quote from Du Bois because of how true it is. No one will learn responsibility until they are given the chance to have responsibility. If someone is waiting for his Bible Teacher to tell him what to do (who to marry, what message to give, where to serve, how to serve, etc.), he is going to have to wait his whole life.
There is a difference between addition and multiplication. It is the difference between a good leader and a midiocre leader. A midiocre leader can attract a certain number of followers but they (the followers) only follow him (addition). A good leader, however, can attract followers who are able to raise followers who are able to attract followers and raise them, etc. (multiplication). Basically, Jesus is the ultimate leader.
The test of a good C.E.O is if, after he leaves, the company continues to work just as it had before. If the company blossoms after the C.E.O. is gone it means he was an obstacle to growth in the company. If the company deteriorates after he is gone it means that he was doing everything himself. Thankfully, Jesus, our true C.E.O. has never left us and never will.
]]>To “obey Jesus’ world mission command” or to be a “good leader/shepherd”, we ought to understand Jesus’ mission statement, which is perhaps the most clear explanation of the gospel of Jesus:
“The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” (Luke 4:16-21)
]]>This discourse strategy seems to protect the speaker from accusation–because the words/phrases/clauses are equivocal, vague, implied–and the strategy passive-aggressively hammers a particular congregant for his/her (real or perceived) offense toward the speaker.
From a sociolinguistic perspective, this strategy could be said to be functioning as a preserver/ re-assertion of the speaker’s status. According to Jesus in Matthew 18:15, however, there is a different way of handling the perceived/real offenses of congregants. I would love to do a paper on this!