Comments on: A Letter to Bibleman http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/ for friends of University Bible Fellowship Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:34:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.3.1 By: jaemanpark1231 http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5329 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:31:39 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5329 Thank you for your article. I think your approach is unique, logical and even more biblical. If I understand your explanation correctly, would it be like this.

“God the Father prunes us who are in Jesus [v2] by His words [3] through the power of the Holy Spirit.”

Although I learned the passage in the similar way in Korea UBF [we should prude ourselves], but my bible teacher prayed that I might be pruned by the power of the Holy Spirit through the word of God and prayers. My experience with that passage was beautiful.

Maybe, because of my biased experience, I felt a little bad about the comments that some people had to mentally/spiritually suffer due to inaccurate interpretation and inappropriate applications of John 15.

I thank God for you who meditate on the Scripture day and night and speak the truth with confidence.

]]>
By: Phil 2 Five http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5289 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:22:01 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5289 Exactly my point!!

“Perhaps you are objecting to the way that some people will use passages of scripture to exert pressure on others to make decisions that God may not be calling them to make.”

>> It seems more often than not, some UBF leaders, tend to tell people what God’s calling is for them. Here’s what frustrates me! Some leaders seem so sure of what God wants you to do, regardless of how God is actually leading you. If you were to disagree then they pull out the ‘deny yourself’ card and put it on the table.

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5288 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:12:53 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5288 Dear Phil 2 Five,

It seems to me that you are not objecting to the idea of pruning yourself. Bibleman doesn’t object to that either. Sometimes it’s necessary.

Perhaps you are objecting to the way that some people will use passages of scripture to exert pressure on others to make decisions that God may not be calling them to make. They try to use John 15:2 to prune others in inappropriate ways. Bibleman doesn’t like that.

]]>
By: Phil 2 Five http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5287 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:52:32 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5287 @Bibleman jajaj, my thoughts on this statement: “From now on, their job is simply to remain in Jesus, to stay in a life-giving union with him as branches attached to a vine, and if they do, the fruit of the saving work of Jesus Christ will be borne through them.” As Brian mentioned earlier, too often the focus in a UBF Bible study is “self”. Like you mentioned before Jesus’ command in John 15 is to remain in Jesus, His love, and His word.

Here’s a quote from a message on John 15:1-8:
(Source: http://ministrydepot.com/sermons/2009/04/sermon-for-john-15-1-8-easter-5-b-loaded-with-fruit/)

“He removes every branch in me that bears no fruit. Near the word, ‘he,’ write in the word, ‘God.’ God is the owner and gardener of the vineyard.
The Pharisees were people who did not have a vital connection with Jesus Christ nor with God. Both John the Baptist and Jesus warned their listeners about the Pharisees and Sadducees who did not produce the good fruit of the kingdom and their dead lives would be pruned and they would be thrown into the unquenchable fire.
We think of tomato plants that grow up and are very full of green leaves but have no tomatoes on them. What a disappointment. We grow tomato plants to raise tomatoes, not simply to have green bushes. Some people like the Pharisees produce lives that are like tomato plants, all show and green. They tithe, read their Bibles and show up in church, but they don’t produce any attitudes and actions of love towards God and the neighbor.” Although I do agree that there are things in our lives which do not produce fruit and need to be ‘cut off’, I do not agree how UBF Bible study are often conducted.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5278 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:56:53 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5278 Ha! No, I think the servers are in Utah. But interestingly enough, the Bluehost team quickly pointed out Sunday on their blog that even the Superbowl people have power problems!

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5277 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:58:45 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5277 Is the server housed at the New Orleans Superdome?

]]>
By: Chris http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5275 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:53:55 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5275 @Ben: You say “that some UBF long-timers have the idea that you should just read the Bible and be directly inspired by the Bible/Holy Spirit, and not be ‘influenced by other sources.'”

Well, if that is so, why then do they require people to make Bible study with a Bible teacher and a questionnaire and listen to Sunday sermons and read the daily bread booklet. Aren’t all of these “other sources”, too? And aren’t these much, much stronger and manipulative than any Bible commentary since they envolve human relationships, and are repeated week for week, year for year?

If the Bible would teach UBF doctrine all out of itself, wouldn’t it suffice to lock people into a room with just the Bible every week, instead of imposing 1:1s, group BSs, conferences, DB, SWS etc. on them?

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5272 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:09:02 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5272 I think you hit on an excellent point Sharon (and a point that someone should develop into a ubfriends article..!) – Narrative theology.

Yes indeed, narrative theology is a valuable approach. I would like to say that seeing the bible as a redemptive narrative is the only way to study it, but I know there are other valid approaches.

And yes, ubf does often use the narrative approach to the bible. The fatal flaw, as I see it, is that in ubf I made the narrative about me. As I continue to reflect on the past 20+ years, I see that I wove myself into the narratives of the bible. When I studied Abraham, I was Abraham. When I studied Jacob, I was Jacob. When I studied Jesus, I was Jesus. I was constantly, week after week, weaving my life into the bible, attempting to imitate the bible characters.

This became problematic. Why? Because I am Brian Karcher (aka. heretic man) and NOT any of the bible characters. I see now that it is fine to learn from the bible, but to put myself into the bible like I was doing led me to live in a fantasy world that became disconnected from reality.

This was a major point of contention between Chris and I in the past :) Thankfully, Chris won this argument! Studying the bible as a narrative is good, but we must see Jesus’ narrative as we live our own, unique narrative together with the Body of Christ.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5271 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:00:22 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5271 Joshua, I like that comment about application and truth. These days I like even more the concept of multi-faceted approaches to the bible and faith.

I am trying to weed out all pendulum type thinking- the “either/or” dichotomies that seem to plague Christianity these days. I think God and the bible and faith are not so binary. The best solution I’ve found is to consider the Trinity and constantly strive for more options.

So I think that avoiding heresy and arrogance is not so simple as getting application and truth right. I think we would need to also consider “reality”, as well as the Spirit’s guidance.

For example, let’s say there is a truth that “2 + 2 = 4”. It is clear that those are the facts. Let’s say the bible teaches such a fact. How do we apply such truth? Well, we would say that a believer must get the answer of “4” whenever adding 2 plus 2. For a lot of people, this is a fine application, and not a problem of conscience.

What if there is a person who has a broken “4” key? That person will never be able to get the same “truth” as everyone else.

This is possibly a lame example, but my point is that the human condition is multi-faceted and not binary. We humans are all broken in some way. We need to deal with our own sins on top of that brokenness. And furthermore we have to face God’s law that reveals our ugliness. And on top of that we seem to have an inherent selfishness. And even if we somehow resolve all of that, we must face God’s curse upon this world.

So to avoid arrogance and heresy, I say we need a magnificent gospel that addresses our entire human condition, not merely truth and the right application.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5269 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:51:40 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5269 ADMIN NOTE: Our host servers experienced a power outage of some sort last night for several hours. Everything came back up this morning, but there may be minor outages today if the host has to restart something.

]]>
By: joshua http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5263 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:48:27 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5263 The pastor in my previous chapter would often say, “Truth without application leads to arrogance, and application without truth leads to heresy.” (paraphrased) I appreciated that saying. It reminded me that in any passage of the Bible, my study should be balanced; on one hand, not only looking for truths that lead me to a deeper understanding of Scripture, but also looking for ways in which the Spirit wants me to put those truths into practice to better love Jesus and God’s people. And on the other hand, not merely trying to find rules/directives in Scripture that need to be applied to me, but to find the deep truths of Jesus Christ, God, and the gospel in each passage.

Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts!

]]>
By: Sharon Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5262 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:47:42 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5262 It isn’t bad to study the Bible as UBF has…it’s a form of narrative theology, which focuses on teaching and hearing stories of faith rather than on propositional truth and systematic theology. This can be a very valuable way to study the Bible and form a faith community with shared purpose and meaning. I think all churches do this to some extent and many would benefit from doing it more. The problem occurs when no attempt is made to understand the context of the original story, and to place it the context of the finished work of Christ, that is to relate it to systematic theology. This is a recipe for error and false teaching

]]>
By: Vitaly http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5261 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:36:03 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5261 To understand John 15:2 in the WESHPRO way – is it bad and wrong? or not so bad? To understand EVERY Bible passage in the similar heritage way – is it bad and wrong or not so?

]]>
By: Vitaly http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5260 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:31:31 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5260 I think that the Bible had been studied through (not all the books) in ubf long ago and there is nothing left to study. Since those golden years everything a ubfer is supposed to do is to learn the heritage interpretation of every Bible passage in order to be an elite christain and the best Bible teacher. Not to be influenced by other sources is not necessarily bad or wrong, but the only ubf source is bad and wrong. And I see in myself that the ubf Bible study style made me unhealthy in my mind and in my relationship with God and his word and I need time to be healed. Though I agree that ubf experience has helped me to understand and discern many “bad” and “strange” things which normal christians have never seen in their life.

]]>
By: Ben Toh http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5259 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:58:20 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5259 I think a major reason why UBF has explained Bible verses and passages out of context, such as in this post, is that some UBF long-timers have the idea that you should just read the Bible and be directly inspired by the Bible/Holy Spirit, and not be “influenced by other sources.” This is not necessarily bad or wrong.

The problem is that some think that if you read Bible references, commentaries, the sermons of others, you are not really studying the Bible.

Then the contradiction is that it is OK to reference some UBF leader’s manuscript, but not the commentary or sermon of others.

Such attitudes may gradually be changing in some UBF chapters. But perhaps not in all UBF chapters.

]]>
By: Vitaly http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5258 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:26:41 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5258 This is what I meant when I spoke about the difference between ubf Bible study and normal (Bibleman’s) Bible study. There is the same difference in every passage we’ve studied since we left ubf (more than a year already). And that’s why I can’t say that ubf is a normal christian church. There is not only spiritual abuse but also Scripture abuse in ubf. btw we’ve studied the John’s gospel newly in a Bibleman’s style)).

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5257 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:17:53 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5257 Thanks for the clarifications Bibleman! And yes, Hereticman fully acknowledges the wrongness and futility of attempting OSHPRUMI, not that Hereticman has ever attempted such a thing…

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5256 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:13:18 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5256 And Bibleman thinks that others should not prune missionaries either. Though that is certainly tempting.

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5255 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:11:03 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5255 Yes. Bibleman thinks that is correct. Although we who are in Jesus have already been pruned (cleaned), there is an ongoing work of pruning (cleaning) that goes on throughout our lives. This is called sanctification. It is the work of God, carried out by the Holy Spirit. We participate in the process, but we do not direct it.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5254 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:59:42 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5254 Hereticman would also like everyone to note that he is not only against WESHPRO, but he also adamantly opposes MISHPRO (“missionaries should prune others”).

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5253 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:57:39 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5253 Hereticman agrees that WESHPRO is not what is being taught by John 15, mostly because he is against cutting off any part of one’s self.

But Hereticman has a question: If we are the branches of Jesus, and the Father is pruning Jesus, doesn’t that also mean the Father may, at times, prune us? Is it a valid inference here in John 15 that if we remain in Jesus, we should be ready to be cleansed/pruned by the Father? And furthermore, if it is the Father doing the pruning, what business does anyone have trying to clean or prune anyone else?

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5252 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:59:37 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5252 Hereticman agrees. He wants to clarify that he uses the Message as the primary source, and encourages the reference of at least 13 translations when trying to understand any part of the bible. He says that Sirach and Wisdom are important to look at as well.

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5251 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:55:11 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5251 Bibleman likes The Message too. But he wouldn’t recommend it as the only version to look at. Neither would Eugene Peterson, the guy who produced it.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5250 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:51:44 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5250 btw, Hereticman now only uses The Message paraphrase version of the bible. It helps heal the scars that he got from using the NIV as a cheesegrater:

John 15

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5249 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:48:22 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5249 That’s ok, Hereticman has your back!

]]>
By: Joe Schafer http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5248 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:45:40 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5248 Thanks, Bibleman forgot about that.

]]>
By: Brian Karcher http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5247 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:40:26 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5247 This is simply awesome! I concur fully with Bibleman. Near the end of my time in ubf, I got so sick of having to replace “Jesus” with “me” when studying the bible. We were even told at the last conference I ever attended to replace “Jesus” with “me” in Jesus’ high priestly prayer…. “glorify me!” we all shouted. Well not all of us. It was so surreal.

ADMIN NOTE: I added a “more” tag so that the front page looks normal.

]]>
By: Chris http://www.ubfriends.org/2013/02/01/a-letter-to-bibleman/#comment-5246 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:00:46 +0000 http://www.ubfriends.org/?p=5485#comment-5246 Bibleman to the rescue again, just in time!

]]>