You wrote that your cat was 13 years old, i.e. you got it shortly after the regnancy of Samuel Lee. Is this only coincidence? Did you have time to think about cats or dogs before?
]]>Yes, I know, I’m a barking old dog who can only complain about the past and bash UBF. But that was our reality.
]]>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2014/10/31/saving-my-dog-for-all-saints-eve-by-john-frye/
]]>I have much to say on this one…maybe I’ll write a book about it :)
My first thought is about the emphasis of Romans 3, that it is: “possibly the most important single paragraph ever written” and “the chief point, and the very central place of the Epistle, and of the whole Bible.”
Because we’ve done this elevation of these few verses, I see that we’ve skewed the gospel messages toward atonement debates. Certainly I love a good debate, but I am not in favor of elevating a few verses, now matter how great, to the status of exclusive status of defining the gospel.
We must check anything we learn from Romans 3 against other places. The gospel of peace is a good one to keep in mind when discussing Romans 3 and atonement theories. In fact, just few verses later, Paul brings up this point, in Romans 5:1 “Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ…”
If our view of justification by faith does not end up with peace, we have strayed from the gospel even if we started with the gospel correctly.
So much division, discord and heartache could be avoided if more Christians would develop a deeper and more rich understanding of the manifold gospel.
]]>