UBFism – Discipleship Model

The UBF discipleship model, as we former leaders understand it, is composed of two phases: sheep training and shepherd training. The total UBF training period is typically 7 to 9 years in total. After that, you are expected to be a lifelong UBF loyalist and shepherd. In this model, the disciple has much difficulty discerning between following Jesus and following UBF. The cyclic pattern blurs the line until God equates to the UBF organization.

The outline below is derived from our former leadership experience at UBF and also from a publicly posted UBF presentation, entitled: 2010 Fishing and Outreach Director’s Conference. The cycle is intended to repeat for a person’s entire lifetime.

Source reference:
[http://dupage-ubf.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/fishing_outreach_1.pptx]

Sheep Training (up to 5 years)

Stage 1: Birthing (1 to 9 months)

Goal – commit to bible study
Starts after first bible study

Stage 2: Rooting (1 to 2 years)

Goal – adopt the UBF worldview
Starts after Sunday service attendance

Stage 3: Growing (1 to 2 years)

Goal – pursue more training
Starts after sharing Life Testimony

Shepherd Training (2 to 4 years)

Stage 4: Disciple Training (about 1 year)

Goal – identity as “Shepherd X”
Starts after joining common life

Stage 5: Soldier Training (1 to 2 years)

Goal – obedience to UBF authorities
Starts after college graduation

Stage 6: Leader Training (about 1 year)

Goal – loyalty for life
Starts after Marriage by Faith

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

UBFism – Glossary

Former UBF leaders have compiled a glossary of terms, idioms, acronyms and phrases that make up the UBF language. Insiders at UBF will recognize most of these terms immediately.

1:1

abbreviation for one-to-one Bible study

12

A frequently used number in UBF. Most often is used in a UBF goal, such as a goal to indoctrinate 12 initiates. In many chapters, the director requests that each member must have a UBF goal of indoctrinating 12 initiates, regardless of how many initiates the member currently handled. Note here a similarity to the G12 vision, a church growth model which incorporates the belief that each Christian should “disciple” twelve new Christians because that is what Jesus did.

120

UBFers have lifted this number from Acts 1:15. It is most often used as a goal for the total number of members of a UBF chapter. It is also used as a numerical goal for how many initiates the person wants to indoctrinate during his or her lifetime.

2nd gen

abbreviation for a second-generation missionary. Refers to any children born to Korean missionaries in UBF whether they are or want to be UBF missionaries. The term is almost never applied to German, Russian, Indian, American, or other national members’ children.

Abraham of Faith (Sarah of Faith)

Term to describe the first non-Korean male (or female) to become a sufficiently indoctrinated member of a UBF chapter. This person ranks highest in spiritual order among chapter members who are not UBF Koreans. Usually, he acts as the right-hand man of the Korean chapter director. He is usually praised and is looked upon as a role model for all initiates. The term “Abraham of Faith” derives from a twisting of the meaning of Genesis 12. Just as Abraham was called by God to leave his home and family and go to an unknown place under God’s direction, so UBF initiates are expected to leave their life behind to become completely devoted to UBF. Note: The “Abraham of Faith” in the USA left UBF, citing matters of conscience in 2001.

ancestor of faith

An “ancestor” is a similar concept to an “Abraham” of faith. While the Abraham is the first non-Korean recruit in a country, the ancestors of faith are those who came shortly after.

Back to the Bible

One of several UBF slogans. Usually to go “back to the Bible” is a rally cry after people leave a chapter, intended to focus the remaining group members on the Bible, not necessarily to really understand the Bible, but to focus their attention away from the people who left the chapter. This slogan is repeated enough so that UBF members keep their minds in the Bible and forget about their family or friends.

Bible academy

A short series of nightly or daily meetings where UBF members share their testimonies. This is a mini version of the UBF conferences.

Bible America

Common UBF slogan and UBF goal. When UBFers pray for “Bible America,” they are praying that UBFism would spread over the United States and become the major religion.

Bible Korea

Common UBF slogan and UBF goal. When UBFers pray for “Bible Korea,” they are praying that UBFism would spread starting from Korea over all the world and become the major religion of the world.

Bible materials

“Bible materials” or “Bible study materials” refers to a binder of notes or more recently a set of UBF questionnaires that have been answered. May include messages and testimonies. This does not include commentaries, lexicons or other typical Bible study helps.

Bible study

This is the core element of the UBF indoctrination and manipulation system. Bible study is almost always done in a hierarchical setting with one person acting as the Bible teacher (shepherd) and the other one as the Bible student (sheep). All initiates have to go through this one-to-one Bible study every week, often for many years, and often continuing with a senior missionary as teacher even after they have become shepherds themselves. In addition, there are also group Bible study where usually the chapter director acts as the Bible teacher. UBF Bible studies are always based on a questionnaire. UBF uses human effort (i.e prayers and repetition) instead of historical, intellectual or spiritual study of the Bible. In this way, Bible study often becomes an idol. After many years, a UBFer cannot stop Bible study even if a friend or loved one is in need.

Bible teacher

the role of the UBF missionary or shepherd in a UBF Bible study

broken shepherd heart

A curiously worded phrase that combines two images – “broken heart” and “shepherd heart.” This phrase essentially means zeal for UBF recruiting and thought reform. Zealous UBFers are said to have a “broken heart” because they call and harass delinquent initiates in an attempt to bring them back into conformity. Those who are active in recruiting and applying thought reform to initiates are said to have a “shepherd heart.” They are acting as a “shepherd” for the initiates who are spiritually blind, lost “sheep”. Often, UBFers pray to have a “broken shepherd heart,” and often they are rebuked for not having one.

brother

Male initiate. The lowest possible title for a UBF male, someone who just started Bible study and is still skeptical about God and the Bible, or about UBF. Also used synonymously with “sheep”. Active members do not call each other “brothers,” but “shepherd” or “missionary”. This is a strange reversal of how this word is used in ordinary churches.

by faith

A widely used epithet the portent of which is this – a UBF member is expected to accept the teaching of and follow the direction of those who are higher in spiritual order, no matter how ridiculous, improper, bizarre, abusive, or un-Christian these teachings and directions are. Many UBF leaders intentionally put their underlings in outrageous situations, or make bizarre demands of them, and tell them that they must put up with it “by faith.” If they go along, they are praised. The way the phrase is used, UBF members get the idea that if they deviate from their leaders’ desires, they are not having faith in God. Thus, the leaders’ will is seen as God’s will and blindly following the leader is seen as having faith in God.

chapter director

Every UBF chapter is operated by a single leader, the “chapter director,” who is usually Korean. Recently some “natives” (non-Koreans) have been appointed as chapter directors.

CME

CME is the abbreviation for “Continuing Missionary Education”. This is a program with the goal to continuously remind the missionaries in UBF of the so-called spiritual heritage of the UBF.

CMI

Campus Mission International. This is a campus ministry formed out of the reform movement in the year 2000, lead by Korean UBF missionaries who rejected Samuel Lee’s authority and abusive tactics and off-center Bible teaching.

common life

Term used to describe cohabitation among UBF members. Many UBF chapters own one or more apartments or houses that they use for this purpose. The idea is to get promising initiates to live with more seasoned UBFers. Thus, the initiates are removed from a normal home or dorm environment into a UBF environment.

co-worker

Committed UBF member. Also used as UBFism for “spouse”. For instance, when introducing his spouse, a UBFer would say “this is my co-worker missionary Sarah.” This reflects the UBF mindset of marriage – that one’s spouse is to be a coworker in UBF first, and a husband or wife second. Using this language, the relevance of marriage is reduced to an instrument for UBF mission.

criticism

This is a very negatively charged word in UBF. Every kind of criticism is categorically undesirable in UBF and seen as unspiritual.

dead dog training

Training reserved for specific people, usually the most independent or bold recruits, or anyone seen as a threat to the UBF power and authority. A UBF director has the authority to train a UBFer to obey just as a “dead dog,” who lies still when beaten.

decision of faith

UBFers often speak of making a “decision of faith.” This often refers to making a decision of blind faith to obey the orders of one higher up in the spiritual order. It may also refer to doing something completely unreasonable in order to accommodate UBF demands. For instance, couples with young children often make a “decision of faith” to leave their children without proper care so that they can attend a UBF meeting. During meetings, leaders often give verbal praise to those who have made “decisions of faith.”

family-centered

Derogative term applied to those who have a normal healthy relationship with their family, or indeed any relationship at all. UBF prefers that its unmarried members have no connection to their family members outside of UBF and that married members spend as little time as possible with their spouses and kids and in their homes, but devote their time for activities in the UBF center or recruiting new members. Therefore, UBF often blames people as being “family-centered,” implying that they are not “God-centered.” Often verses such as Mark 3:35 are used to back up this idea, while verses such as Titus 2:4-5 who promote a family-centered life, are ignored. The opposite of “family-centered” is “mission-centered”.

feeding sheep

UBFism for making Bible study with initiates that does not correspond to Jesus’ teaching to “feed my sheep.” Feeding means coercing someone to conform to UBF ideology.

general director

The top leader of the UBF worldwide has the title “UBF General Director”. After the death of its founder, Samuel Lee, at first Sarah Barry and then John Jun and Abraham Kim have held that position. The hierarchy of directors in UBF also conmprises continental directors, national directors and chapter directors.

HNW

abbreviation for “Holy Nation Woman”. Samuel Lee also liked to use the phrase “High Nosed Women” to distinguish between those who were obedient to UBF ideology and those who were proudly disobedient. A Caucasian native-born American female. UBF chapters have a numerical goal for how many HNWs they want to recruit. These are very valuable recruits because UBF has traditionally had difficulty obtaining members of this demographic group.

Kingdom of Priests

Often used in the combination “a Kingdom of Priests and a Holy Nation”. A perennial UBF slogan. UBF sees itself as a special people, called by God himself to carry out the work of UBFism. They attempt to justify their inflated self-opinion with allusions to scripture – Exodus 19:6 and 1 Peter 2:9 in particular. However, note that the New Testament verse alluded to is seen by most Protestants as establishing the priesthood of all believers. UBF rejects the priesthood of all believers because it conflicts with their idea of “spiritual order.”

konglish

“Korean language style English” – the broken English that some Korean missionaries in UBF speak. Though most Koreans in UBF are able to learn English amazingly fast in the beginning, their interest in learning the language more deeply quickly stagnates, and since they usually only consort with their Korean peers, many of them speak English just as badly as in the beginning, even after decades. Often they even carry over their bad and reduced language to the native members.

KOPAHN

abbreviation for Kingdom of Priests and a Holy Nation

marriage by faith

A marriage arranged by a UBF leader is called a “marriage by faith” in UBF. It is normally required to “marry by faith” in order to become a UBF leader. This expression implies that all other types of marriage are not by faith. Marriage itself is of little value in UBF, it is regarded only as a means to an end. The expression “marriage by faith” is a typical example of how UBF uses loaded language to manipulate the thoughts and ideas of their members.

marriage problem

This expression is usually applied to an unmarried person, as in “She has a marriage problem.” Translation: She wants to get married but has no prospects that are currently viable.

pioneering

Establishing a new UBF chapter is called “pioneering” in UBF. This word gives the impression that there has never been a Christian church in that city.

Reform UBF (R-Group people)

The UBF chapters which voted for a reform in a worldwide movement in UBF starting in the year 2000 were also known as the “Reform UBF.” The mainstream UBF preferred to call them the “R-group,” where “R” was associated with “rebellious,” and expelled their chapter leaders from UBF after two years. The Reform UBF chapters continued to operate under the new name CMI, separate from UBF.

run away

UBF leaders refer to those who left UBF for whatever reason as people who “ran away,” characterizing them as recreant renegades who left their calling and duty to cowork in UBF.

sheep

Any Bible student in UBF is called a sheep. This term is loosely and incorrectly derived from Bible passages. In the Bible, a “sheep” refers to all people, and Jesus is our Shepherd. But in UBF, people who “grow” are considered to become shepherds or shepherdessess (female shepherd) who has sheep under them. Sheep are supposed to be obedient to their human shepherd if their conscience has a conflict.

sheep are sheep

UBF expression meaning that people who are supposed to be sheep do not behave in the way UBF likes, until pressured.

Shepherd

A sufficiently indoctrinated UBF member is considered to be a “shepherd.” Also used as a title. Usually, a UBFer is called a “Shepherd” once he or she begins to participate in recruiting and indoctrinating initiates. “Shepherd” in UBF always means “personal shepherd,” and every member is eventually expected to live as a UBF shepherd. This is different from the use of the word “shepherd” in the Bible which either refers to Jesus himself or to the group of elders in a church.

Shepherdess

Female shepherd. Also called “mother of prayer”.

sogam

Korean term meaning one’s impressions, opinions, thoughts, feelings and sentiments about something. This term is used in UBF for the written statements based on Bible passages that UBF members are required to write and share every week (see testimony writing and sharing). The idea behind this practice is that members don’t just read a Bible passage, but interpret it in the sense of UBF and give a personal response in front of the group about how they intent to apply it to themselves. Usually this happens by repenting for not having done enough UBF activities or for not being obedient enough, and the promise to do better in the next week, often setting concrete targets. That way, members are able to indoctrinate each other, and leaders are able to closely monitor and control the “spiritual growth” of their members. A new term for sogam is “reflection writing”.

SWS

abbreviation for Sunday worship service where a leader “delivers a message”

uncle sheep

An initiate who is beyond college age. Such a person is not usually a family member of somebody in UBF, but might be. Such persons are seen as being useful only in that they can act as “uncles” for the college age young adults who are really UBF’s targets.

world campus mission

Because UBF only targets young college students, they sometimes call their ministry “world campus mission.”

world mission

UBF calls recruiting UBF members all around the world “world mission.”

world mission command

Deemed by UBF to be the highest and greatest command, and the one command Jesus wants all people to follow.

world mission offering

The money given as a tithe to UBF. All chapters send world mission offerings to a headquarter chapter.

world mission report

An annual meeting in Korea. Non-Korean UBF students who have been faithful to UBF ideology are given trips to the world mission reports as “rewards.” However the students often have to pay their way (or most of it) and they have to share their life testimonies. The student is led to believe such a trip is a reward and to be thankful for such a privilege. This is also sometimes called a “short term journey” or “mission journey” where native (non-Korean) students are paraded around Korea like prized animals captured in the jungle.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2013 Letter from a Grandmother

This is a letter from a grandmother in 2013 whose grandson was participating in UBF as a sheep. Her grandson left the ministry soon after this letter. She summarizes the problems as she sees them:

1. SALVATION

UBF seems to teach their people that salvation and righteousness is by works and can be lost if the Shepherd is disobeyed. Eternal salvation also seems to depend on leadership approval and some are kept in constant doubt of theirs. There even seems to be the thought that no one outside of UBF is saved. How can anyone who knows the Bible believe any of this? Eph. 2:9 says “Not of works last any man should boast.” In John 10:28 Jesus said “Neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.”

2. THE GREAT COMMISSION

UBF seems to believe that this is the highest command of God. Jesus said that the greatest commandment is to love one another. Additionally, the Great Commission also includes water baptism (Matthew 28:19), to which UBF gives little emphasis. How can you obey half of Jesus’s command and thumb your nose at the second part?

3. HOLY SPIRIT

The Holy Spirit seems to be given little emphasis and takes second place to UBF leadership commands (human dictates). This leaves no room for the leading of the Holy Spirit in one’s life. For example, Missionary appointments are by the organization and not dependent upon the call of God. How can anyone who knows the Scripture leave out the work of the third person of the Trinity in their life or the lives of their members? You might want to do some Biblical research on just what the role of the Holy Spirit is in our lives.

4. ORDINANCES

Jesus instituted the ordinances of Water Baptism and Communion (The Lord’s Supper). In fact, he commanded them. How can you just ignore Jesus’s commands and neither teach nor practice them except on rare occasion?

5. SHEPHERDING

Shepherding seems to be a fulcrum of UBF teaching. This practice is not taught in Scripture and leads to abuse and excessive leadership control. In fact, the originators of the shepherding movement (not UBF) have renounced it as a mistake and apologized for their part in it? Why would you want to be a part of an organization that is so caught up in this misguided practice?

6. TESTIMONIES

Testimonies are wonderful but what is the reason for asking people to share sins of which “they need to repent?” It is the Holy Spirit’s ministry to convict of sin, not man’s. Repentance is a personal action between ones self and God, not with an added “father confessor.” Why would you want to participant in an activity In which man attempts to usurp the Holy Spirit’s role?

7. DATING

Dating seems to be looked upon as sin and members are highly discouraged from having any romantic relationships. Why would you want to promote this since it’s not Biblical (read Song of Solomon and the book of Ruth)? Additionally, God made young men and women to be attracted to each other. Why would you want to take something beautiful that God made and condemn it?

8. ARRANGED MARRIAGES

Without getting into details, this is utter nonsense. We live in America, not some other country that still practices arranged marriages. Isaac and Rebekah’s arranged marriage was a special circumstance and has nothing to do with God’s direction for today. How could anyone support such a nonsensical practice that is far from Biblical?

9. DICTATORIAL TACTICS/ DOMINATION OF TIME

There’s a lot that could be said about how UBF uses guilt, authoritarianism and compulsion to control the lives of their members and gradually takes more and more of their time until UBF is the only thing that’s important. How can you sanction using these practices on young people that are trying to get an education and prepare for the future? Do you think God is pleased with this?

10. NEGLECT OF FAMILY DUTIES

UBF has a history of pressing their married members to the point where they neglect their children. There are documented cases of local authorities being notified of parental neglect by UBF parents. How could you be a part of an organization that would so dominate their members as to push them to such non-Christian actions? Do you think God is pleased with this?

11. INTERACTION WITH OTHER CHURCHES

The Bible teaches that His family should not isolate themselves from other Christians yet UBF tries to avoid contact and cooperation with other churches or ministries. You might ask yourself “is there something they are afraid of?” Do you really believe that UBFers are the only ones going to heaven?

12. EXIT STRATEGY

Just one question here: How could you feel good about being a part of an organization that uses threats, fear and intimidation to keep members from leaving. This isn’t exactly the approach the Bible teaches.

13. FINANCIALS

There seems to have been no supervision or control over finances in the past so members didn’t know anything about how much money the organization had or how it used it. How could anyone be expected to support an organization that is so secretive and is not accountable to the people that contribute? Again, not what the Bible teaches.

14. THE BLUE BOOK

Do you have a “blue book” from the 50th Anniversary Missionary/Shepherd Seminar in Korea? If so, are you comfortable with what it says and what’s going to be expected of you over the next 50 years?

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2015 Letter from a 2nd Gen

The darkness of UBF is overwhelming. Secrets hide behind nearly every smiling face that offers you so much as a plate of bulgoki. Growing up, every Sunday I went to CBF at the “center.” Even as I child, I always felt like there was something off about UBF people. I never quite felt like I was at home, or that this was my family.

Upon leaving UBF at age 8 with my family, we went to an unnamed evangelical church in the area. It was there that I entered life and finally learned to be a normal human being. For the first time in my young life, I felt like I could fit in with the other boys, the other children, and I learned about God, who Jesus was, and accepted him into my heart as my Lord and savior.

When I went home and told my Dad about how I had accepted Jesus into my heart as my Lord and Savior, I remember him telling me that they were watering down the truth of God and that what I had experienced and been taught by the nice people at this church wasn’t true. That all I needed to do was believe that Jesus died on the cross of my sins. He told me that I was already more spiritually mature than the other kids at this church because of my time in UBF.

As a little boy, I was crushed, because I felt like I had experienced something good at this new church, and yet my Dad rebuked me for it. Apparently, you can take the shepherd out of UBF, but you can’t take the UBF out of the shepherd.

When I was 12, my Father convinced our family to go back to UBF, because it had “changed.” Looking back now, if what I experience during my teen years was a redeemed version of UBF, I am frightened about what went on before it was reformed. I was prohibited to date, or to even so much as look at a girl. My entire sexual and romantic being was squashed and treated as something to be despised, something evil. Along with this went my self-esteem and sense of self. I am emotionally scarred from this sole experience and to this day am not comfortable with anything relating to romantic relationships or sexuality in general.

We were taught lies. It was demanding of us by our parents and youth leaders that we write and share testimonies every week and there would be guilt and shame delivered unto us if we did not participate. I was made to feel as if the gospel were all about doing random specific things like writing testimonies, studying the bible in a weird specific way, and doing daily bread, etc. When in reality, the gospel is not about what we have to do, but about what Jesus has done for us already on the cross of Calvary

If I had known the history of UBF, that people were subjected to emotionally, physically, and spiritually abusive practices throughout the years, I would have never agreed to go back with my family when I was 12 years old. I was lied to, I was deceived. I was told that things had changed, but the truth is “once a cult, always a cult.” A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough.

Until UBF leaders fully renounce and repent of every destructive practice and illegal action that has ever been been committed by UBF members, it was always be a cult, no matter how much things have changed. End of Story.

 

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2012 Open Letter to UBF Leaders

(Sent to the General Director and over 200 UBF leaders)

December 13th, 2012

Abraham Kim, General Director
University Bible Fellowship
Chicago, IL USA

Dear Abraham,

We are now in the 2012 Advent season, just before Christmas. As I ponder the amazing life of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, I am moved to share this public letter. Why do I write publicly? The reason is clear: over the past 50 years, many members of UBF and former members of UBF have raised questions, issues, concerns and allegations about the ministry you now oversee. Many attempts have been made to follow Jesus’ direction on handling matters of concern in private. The result has been overwhelming silence, minor changes now and then and an increase in the effort of those who remain in UBF leadership to deny and dismiss the concerns.

So today I write openly, after resigning my position of Director of Detroit UBF in the summer of 2011. I write today in hopes of realizing what my friend James Kim wrote in his open letter in 1994: “I wanted to build a better UBF.”

I’d like to begin by drawing your attention to some prior open letters sent to UBF leadership, and to share with you some numbers.

Prior Open Letters

In 1976, some senior Korean leaders in UBF wrote their open letter:

http://rsqUBF.info/documents/reform/1976-open-letter/

In 2007, a former Korean leader in UBF wrote an open letter:

http://rsqUBF.livejournal.com/123416.html?thread=625432

In 2011, a current American UBF leader in UBF wrote an open letter:

http://www.UBFriends.org/2011/02/02/questions-for-the-next-general-director/

Numbers:  11,153 vs 3

First of all I would like to point out 3 positive events that have occurred in the past 2 years since I left UBF. “The Well” ministry has made significant improvements to the traditional UBF ministry. I fully support this initiative. “Westloop Church” has become what I call “redeemed UBF”. I have worshiped with them and visited three times recently. “The Ethics Committee” work with John Armstrong has been an extraordinary step in the right direction. Listening to Mr. Armstrong and connecting with the larger body of Christ is essential for any ministry to be healthy.

Even though UBF ministry has taken those three steps forward, I want to point out the huge load of burden that UBF carries. In total, there are at least 11,153 reasons for concern. I would like for you to notice the following:

159 – There are 159 testimonies of pain, sorrow, agony and abuse written by former UBF members and published on this blog: http://exUBF.blogspot.com/  These testimonies have been published already for many years. They form the primary public record of UBF.

13 – Since I left UBF, there have been 13 UBF leaders (fellowship leaders or director level) who have reached out to me to share their concerns and issues with UBF ministry.

103 – I counted up all the people who had left Toledo UBF (my prior UBF chapter where I spent 16 years as a member and fellowship leader). If you count men, women and children, 103 people left Toledo UBF with a problematic departure over the course of 21 years, from 1990 to 2011. I know all of them. Many are still friends with me. None of them left on good terms, though some have since reconciled at least partially. Some won’t discuss UBF any longer. Others have written UBF ministry out of their life story because of the pain.

5,269 – According to Google Analytics, there have been 5,269 “unique visitors” on my priestlynation.com blog over the past 1 and half years. This means 5,269 unique computing devices viewed at least one page on my blog. It is safe to say that several thousand people from around the world are interested in reading my criticism of UBF minsitry. The top 10 countries of people reading my blog are from the countries with the largest UBF chapters, such as the USA, Germany, Canada and South Korea.

220 – So far, I have published over 200 articles on this blog, priestlynation.com. I have shared my personal journey as I left UBF, my thoughts on what could be changed, and various thoughts that came to mind as I struggled to make sense of my 24 years in UBF ministry.

503 – Not only are a lot of people interested in reading my articles, the content generated over 500 comments. Several people are very interested in discussing the issues and topics I raise here.

206 – My blog is not the only public discussion website. The UBFriends.org website published over 200 articles as well. That website is far more friendly to UBF and presents more robust articles than mine.

4,680 – The 206 articles on UBFriends.org invoked over 4,000 comments. Many of those commenting are current UBF members and leaders. This is evidence that the topics covered on that website are highly important to UBF members, many of whom are willing to openly discuss the topics.

Two Demands

In light of my own struggle with leaving UBF ministry and the mountain of evidence above, I submit the two demands below to you for UBF ministry. I have given much thought and prayer to this. I have read all of the evidence above for myself. For many years now, I have been discussing UBF matters with dozens of former and current UBF members from places such as the USA, Germany, Russia, China and Ukraine. I have had well over 3,000 email conversations regarding problems, abuses, issues and changes. I have had in-person meetings and discussions with John Armstrong. I have read several heartbreaking emails from former UBF members who continue to reach out to me– people who are struggling with things like depression, anxiety and the burden of guilt left over from their time in UBF. Several former members are seeking psychological counselling or have considered such counselling. And most importantly, I have discussed these things with my wife.

I have attempted to express my feelings through several songs. If you listen to these songs, or at least read the lyrics from my point of view, you may begin to understand the range of emotions behind this open letter.

I have become convinced the following two issues are at the core of the present “crisis” facing UBF– the crisis of members leaving. I use the word “crisis” because that is what your 50th Anniversary Book describes in the last lecture.

Demand #1 – Admit abuse.

Publicly and internally end the denial and admit the reality, facing the fact that UBF shepherding has created an environment that has led to many instances of abuse, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse and emotional abuse.

Demand #2 – Release the bonds.

Publicly and internally announce that all UBF shepherd/sheep relationships are now dissolved– any remaining study relationships are now voluntary, not required of every member, no longer binding for life, secondary to the Holy Spirit’s work, and at the discretion and choice of the “sheep”.

Is the work of God primarily about denial and authority? Can UBF ministry continue without facing the facts? Will UBF ministry be effective by continuing to enforce permanent shepherd/sheep relationships? Might the work of God be done through friendship?

If you are willing to consider these thoughts, I would be happy to meet in public or in private to discuss my further thoughts on how UBF might find a way to become a healthy Christian ministry. I would welcome your public or private response to this letter.

Sincerely with hope,

Brian John Karcher
12/13/2012

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2000 UBF USA Reform Declaration

REFORM DECLARATION

USA REFORM UBF CHAPTERS in the year 2000

“For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:45)

Thank God for the wonderful work that he has done among us for the last 39 years. He has been so gracious to use many co-workers to accomplish campus evangelism and world mission. We give thanks to God the Spirit who has been with us in sending out 1,500 missionaries to 87 countries. At the same time, we believe that the time has come for us to examine 40 years of ministry and recognize our shortcomings and failures caused by our man-centered church structure. It is also time to renew our gospel faith that has been dangerously perverted because one man took the place of the Spirit in the Church.

In order to remain faithful to the God-given task of campus evangelism and world mission in this rapidly changing society, we must solve some serious problems that are a disgrace to God’s glory within UBF. We believe, therefore, that the worldwide reform movement within the UBF ministry that has begun from the Republic of Korea should be considered seriously and implemented swiftly. We can no longer wait but we must change now so that God may use us and we may be a royal priesthood and God’s holy people. The Bible teaches us that as Christians we must grow in God’s holy image in obedience to his words. But in UBF, knowingly and unknowingly, we have been forced to please and obey one man. The spiritual leader should serve the flock of God with humility like Jesus. Over the approximately 40 years of UBF ministry this basic principle of the servantship of Jesus has been gradually forgotten. One leader, Dr. Samuel Lee, has exercised his immense authority over all aspects of the UBF ministry, and the majority of the remaining members have to obey him blindly out of fear that they will be forced out of the church if they do not obey him. Unfortunately, many UBF directors in the U.S. and abroad have adopted this pattern of authoritative leadership practice in the name of training and divine discipline.

We have major concerns that if we ignore this unhealthy way of leadership practice in UBF we are going to facilitate bringing destruction to our ministry and we will all eventually become the victims of Satan instead of growing in God’s image as the servants of Jesus in our times. Therefore, for the purpose of reforming the ministry of God, we in humility and holy fear declare the following:

The Lordship of Jesus Christ

The church of Jesus Christ is built on the confession that Jesus Christ who rose from the dead is the Lord of lords. It means that Christ is the head of the church and all individuals follow him. This confession notwithstanding, in the practical life of UBF Christ’s Lordship is not practiced and human leadership subtly replaces it. Following are examples of such practice:

A. The annual MSU international conference has been tightly planned and controlled by one man, Dr. Lee. As the name indicates, this is an international conference. The conference programs should be organized with input from the UBF ministry in the entire world. But Dr. Lee has determined everything without consulting anyone. This includes the program, schedule, content of each message, and the invitation of guests from overseas. This unfair exercise has generated much frustration and skepticism among many leaders and co-workers about the validity and significance of this annual conference.

B. The staff meeting in the USA has been frequently scheduled without giving an advanced notice. Most chapter directors are lay missionaries. They often have no idea when to expect the staff meeting. The norm is that Dr. Lee decides when we will have the meeting at his convenience. Such a practice makes our lives unnecessarily difficult. We don’t find it to be a test of faith to be invited to a staff meeting with insufficient prior notice. Rather, it actually hurts our witness to the worldly people who generally take their jobs seriously. It also places an unnecessary financial burden on us. For example, some of our co-workers were not notified until three days before the staff meeting in 1999. This short notice meant that they had to pay unnecessarily expensive airfare. Concerning the staff meeting in the fall of 2000, [The chapter director of Ohio UBF] was informed not to come to the meeting at all without receiving any reasonable explanations.

C. [The chapter director of Milwaukee UBF] was initially invited to the U.S. as a possible successor to Samuel Lee. So, [he] gave up a prestigious position in the Korean Military Academy and came to the USA. He was, however, suddenly sent to Milwaukee UBF when he stated to Dr. Lee that Chicago UBF should be changed for the glory of God. We do not have a clue as to why this happened. Presently, many signs point to the possibility that Little Sam, the son of Samuel Lee, will become the successor. Little Sam has served as a messenger for the past two international conferences and delivered a message for the last UBF USA staff meeting. His picture was put in the middle of the UBF calendar with the title, “UBF Associate,” whatever that means. But choosing a successor is not just one man’s affair but the affair of the entire UBF. The effort on Samuel Lee’s part to make his son his successor shows that Dr. Lee regards UBF as his family business. We cannot accept and tolerate this kind of preposterous attitude toward the church of God.

UBF should use offerings to build up God’s work and to nurture God’s people. We know that all the chapters in the USA as well as in 87 nations are sending tithes to Chicago UBF, headquarters of all UBF chapters. Small chapters in the U.S. and the rest of the world with less than 15 Sunday worship service attendents send 80-100% of their offerings to Chicago UBF. Nevertheless, there has been no report on how these offerings are being used. Often some co-workers fall into financial crises, but in UBF they are scarcely taken care of. Furthermore, many missionaries invited to the MSU international conference are supported by their respective Korean chapters or by the Korean UBF headquarters. For the annual world mission report which is held in Korea each USA chapter provides travel expenses for their members who are selected to attend the meeting. It seems unusual, however, that Korea UBF also pays all of Dr. Lee’s expenses as well as giving him the entire collection made through this meeting. He collects much more than his actual expenses incurred at every occasion.

The Community of Love

Each co-worker is a part of the body of Christ. In his New Commandment given to his disciples, Jesus taught them to love one another. It means that each believer proves that he or she is a true disciple of Jesus when he or she obeys this commandment. Therefore, the body of Christ is meant to be a community of love. When we lose this love, we become like a political party, fighting among ourselves and being disgraceful to Jesus. We are deeply concerned about this matter.

A. In Chicago UBF approximately 50 missionaries have left the UBF ministry in large part because of Dr. Samuel Lee’s unfair and unethical treatment of the members. Many of them had been key members for many years. We hear that they regularly meet to support one another. In addition, many American shepherds have also left the ministry. Most of them have genuinely loved the mission-oriented life in UBF. Out of deep pains they are operating a Web site declaring that UBF is a cult. We admit that some of their opinions are indeed skewed and exaggerated. Such an incident can be easily stopped if we sincerely reform ourselves. Their wounds in their hearts also would be healed if we sincerely reform ourselves. We don’t think that those who have left UBF have lost their faith, but that they have done so because of their painful experience with and profound disappointment in Dr. Lee and his corruption that is well covered by his “henchmen”.

B. [Several Korean missionaries] had carried the cross of pioneering American campuses at a time when we wondered whether or not it could happen for Korean missionaries. They worked as chapter directors. They sacrificed their lives in serving the Lord and gave us hope for the ministry in the USA. Now, they are excommunicated from the ministry that they loved so much. Why? Their positive and productive opinions were ignored whenever they raised important issues to reform the UBF ministry. [One Korean man] was a Russian UBF director. Last summer, he rightly criticized Dr. Lee’s self-centered and obstinate behavior and was immediately excommunicated when [someone] snitched it to Dr. Lee. In his dealings with these matters, Samuel Lee completely failed to demonstrate Jesus’ love toward these faithful people. These problems display his lack of spiritual discernment based upon truth. He does not have the courage to love his closest people who speak the truth to him. His narrow and cowardly mind and his practicing his own favoritism instead of practicing the genuine love of Jesus are the very causes that have taken away the love of God from UBF.

C. The UBF newsletter should be published to give thanks to God and glorify him for what he has done for the ministry. But it is misused to praise or condemn certain people. Those who stand with Dr. Lee always receive favorable reports. Their ministry is groundlessly praised and exaggerated in the newsletter. Even when the report is greatly distorted, these people don’t care about what the true state of their ministry is but instead believe what Dr. Lee says about them to be truer than what the facts actually are. Their minds are totally controlled by him. Unfortunately, most ministries, especially those which are not favored by Dr. Lee or small in numbers, are hardly given any recognition. Sometimes the newsletter criticizes some leaders, although they are widely respected by others. We feel ashamed to show this kind of newsletter to American students. This kind of pseudo journalism causes and promotes a judgmental spirit among us, making some proud while driving others into self-doubt. Such unhealthy treatment will make us like the sect of Pharisees who were proud, self-righteous, and always critical of others. The newsletter should encourage hard-working co-workers with compassion and wisdom. It is better to stop publishing newsletters if they continue to be the way they are.

Opportunity of education and spiritual growth

Education is an important investment for raising leaders for the future ministry. Without a proper education it is impossible to make the ministry of Jesus grow. We have long been trained to study the Bible, to follow and imitate Dr. Samuel Lee’s style of Bible study. This approach has given us one way of looking at the Word of God. Such over-simplification of the Word of God has stunted the intellectual ability of young people. Many young people are deeply frustrated from this narrow and outdated study method. But due to the lack of proper education they do not know how to break from this limitation and expand their minds. The Creator God wants us to continually grow spiritually and intellectually so that we may not lose the zeal for mission.

A. At every UBF staff conference, directed by one person, we have to listen to basically the same messages and testimonies over and over. Every staff conference tires us out. It burdens us rather than refreshening us. These kinds of meetings only waste our co-workers’ time, energy, and life. These types of activities do not encourage us. We need to overhaul the entire contents of our staff conferences. It is necessary to invite other respected Christian leaders from outside and hear their voices. In this way, our co-workers can be encouraged, rejuvenated, and strengthened.

B. Some of the UBF staff and co-workers should be financially supported. Some of the directors, after a certain point and when there is justifiable rationale, should be able to fully concentrate on God’s work without their work being restrained because of financial problems. Presently, most directors work as lay missionaries. How can we successfully carry out world mission if we restrain co-workers who are able and dedicated to fully devote themselves to the work of God? It is therefore necessary to spend money to raise up certain people for full-time ministry. We should spend money to send them to seminaries for a better education.

C. Second generation children are the future hope of our ministry. How do we help them to learn faith by which they can face this great and intimidating country? Don’t we need to develop good educational programs to help them? But it seems that the present solution Dr. Lee has for them is, in a word, marriage. So, they are quickly given to marriage while they are still young and without independent faith. It is clear that these marriages are performed in the pretext of protecting them from temptations. But it is more likely that the hidden agenda is to keep them in the UBF ministry. Is there a true guarantee that marriage at such an early age will keep them from temptation? Don’t we see how even married people in UBF fall into temptation and commit sin? These young people are deprived by this strategic marriage of great opportunities to spread their wings in the vast world and find themselves. Another problem in arranging marriage for the second generation is an absence of open discussion with either one who is supposed to marry or the parents of one who is supposed to marry. Therefore, marriage cannot be used as a means for protecting the second generation from temptation or for keeping them as UBF members. If marriage is necessary, it must be done for the glory of God after open communication with the person who is supposed to marry and after full consultation with the parents of one who is supposed to marry. Furthermore, various educational programs need to be developed through which our young growing generation can explore themselves and learn a living knowledge and faith in their lives.

We prayerfully ask Dr. Samuel Lee to make a personal decision. We ask him to seriously consider these problems and give honest answers. And we demand that he make earnest spiritual efforts to rectify these problems. Otherwise, Dr. Lee should hand over the leadership to a better-qualified person whom most UBF leaders approve. We pray for UBF to grow to be a ministry that all people respect as a God-loving and spiritual ministry. We want to feel confident and proud that we are part of this ministry. Thus, the long needed and awaited reform that is taking place in various places should also start in the U.S. right now. Whoever watches the wind will not plant; whoever looks to the clouds will not reap (Ecclesiastes 11:4). If we wait for perfect conditions we will never get anything done. The time is now. Thank God for his mercy on each of us.

In Christ,

The Committee of the UBF-USA Reform Movement

 

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2004 Petition to the NAE

This public petition was signed by over 100 former UBF members and was successful in removing UBF from the United States organization called the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE). In 2008, UBF re-applied and was re-admitted to the NAE after the leadership changed at the NAE.

To:  The National Association of Evangelicals

We, the undersigned, call on the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) to revoke the membership of the University Bible Fellowship (UBF) which has been a member organization of the NAE since 1995. We former members of the UBF and concerned relatives, friends and others feel compelled to inform you of the true nature of the UBF. Many pages can and have been written relating peoples’ negative personal experiences in the UBF organization. However, we will merely point out certain facts and observations that have been made and reported about the UBF by neutral parties, the press and experts who deal with the problem of abusive churches and cults, both here and abroad.

In his book, Churches That Abuse, (Zondervan, 1992) Christian sociologist Ron Enroth devotes a chapter (chapter 5 – “Manipulation and Control: Abusive Churches Use Fear, Guilt and Threats”) to describe the spiritual abuse of an American college student in the Chicago headquarters of the UBF.

Joachim Keden, pastor and former cult expert of the Protestant Church in the Rhineland (Germany), classified the UBF as a cult-like group. Pastor Keden described the UBF’s cultic practices and teachings in an article included in the book Sogenannte Jugendsekten und die okkulte Welle (So-Called Youth Cults and the Occult Wave) published by Aussaat Verlag, Neukirchen-Vluyn 1989, p. 132-146. The translated text of this article can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/keden1989.en.htm.

Andrew Schäfer, the current cult commissioner of the Protestant Church in Rhineland describes the UBF as a cult-like group. Mr. Schäfer also devotes an entire chapter to describe the UBF in his recently published book, Im Labyrinth der Seelenfänger (In the Maze of the Soul Catchers),

In August 1991, in its monthly publication, the Documentation Service of the German Protestant Centre for Religious and Ideological Issues (EZW) published a 4-page report titled “Erfahrungen mit der University Bible Fellowship (UBF): Persönlicher Bericht einer Mutter” (“Experiences with the University Bible Fellowship (UBF): Personal Report by a Mother”). The report is basically the personal memoranda of the mother of a UBF recruit who first accompanied her daughter into the UBF and then helped her daughter to leave the group. The translated text of this report can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/mdezw1991.en.htm.

The UBF is described as a cult on pp. 97-111 of the book Sekten – Die neuen Heilsbringer (Cults – the New Bringers of Salvation), A Handbook, by Heide-Marie Cammans, Düsseldorf, Germany 1998. The translated text of this report can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/cammans1998.en.htm.

The Wellspring Retreat & Resource Center (wellspringretreat.org), a Christian residential treatment facility for recovering cult victims, reports that it has treated former members of the UBF who showed signs of having been psychologically damaged by their time in the group.

The American Family Foundation (www.csj.org) in its publication Cult Observer has characterized the UBF as a cultic group.

In September 1986, the UBF was banned from the campus of the University of Winnipeg in Canada for cult-like activities. The banning of the UBF became front page news in the Winnipeg Free Press, the newspaper with the largest circulation in the city of Winnipeg and one of the largest and most respected newspapers in Western Canada. The text of the two Winnipeg Free Press articles published on October 25, 1986 can be read on-line: lead article, followup article.

In February 1991, The Silhouette, the student newspaper of McMaster University (Ontario), published a brief story headlined “Cult Banned” about the 1991 banning of the UBF from another Canadian university, the University of Manitoba for cult-like activities. The text of this report can be read at http://www.geocities.com/escapeUBF/outside_material/SILHOUETTE.htm.

In December 1993, the UIC News, a weekly publication of the University of Illinois at Chicago, published an article headlined “UIC worries about cult recruitment; three cases this fall.” The article dealt mainly with the UBF’s activities on the UIC campus. The text of this article can be read at http://rsqUBF.fortunecity.net/documents/external/uicnews1993.html

In September 1999, the Ilmenau University News, a publication of the Ilmenau Technical University in Germany, published a brief titled “HRK Warns of Cult.” The brief reported that the chairman of the Conference of College Rectors (HRK) in Germany sent a written warning to all German colleges to beware of the cult-like group UBF, appealing to the colleges to refuse any support or recognition to the UBF and to apply their authority where necessary to restrict the UBF’s campus activities. The translated text of this brief can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/hrk1999.en.htm.

In June 2000, the Guardian Unlimited, an on-line British daily newspaper published an article headlined “Cult Following” in which the UBF is mentioned alongside the Unification Church and the International Church of Christ as a cult-like group that targets college students for recruitment. The text of this article can be read at http://www.geocities.com/escapeUBF/outside_material/Guardian.htm.

In December 2001, the Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a weekly student newspaper of the Johns Hopkins University, published an article headlined “Cult-like Evangelist Group Targeted Recent JHU Undergrads.” The article dealt solely with the UBF’s aberrant teachings and practices. This article can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/jhu2001.en.htm

In May 2002, the Syracuse Daily Orange, the student newspaper of Syracuse University, published an article headlined “For Christ’s Sake: Cult-like Groups Pose Potential Threat To College Students.” The article names the UBF alongside the International Church of Christ, the Unification Church and Lyndon LaRouche as a cult-like group that targets college students for recruitment. The text of this article can be read at http://rsqUBF.fortunecity.net/documents/external/syracuse-do2002.html

The UBF has been been forbidden to do street recruiting of new members within the Chicago campuses of Loyola University and DePaul University after UBF shepherds were arrested on these campuses in the late 1990s for the undue harassment of students.

On February 27, 1994, the CBS television news affiliate in Chicago broadcast an investigative report about the UBF during its primetime news broadcast. This report focused on allegations of cult-like activities in the Chicago headquarters of the UBF.

On May 5, 1997, the NBC television news affiliate in Chicago also broadcast an investigative report about the UBF during its primetime news broadcast. This report focused on allegations of cult-like activities in the Triton University chapter of the UBF in the Chicago suburbs. The transcript of this broadcast report can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/nbc5triton1997.en.htm.

From 1985 to 1987, the Bonner General-Anzeiger, a daily newspaper that serves the city of Bonn, Germany, published a series of articles about cult recruitment at the University of Bonn. The translated headlines of these articles are: “Cults: Not Recognizable For Everyone” (8/28/85), “Information About Student Cults — Loss of Mental Autonomy” (12/16/86), “Loss Of Emotional And Spiritual Self-Determination Threatens The Newly Recruited Members Of Youth Cults” (12/18/86), “Trends Among Youth Offer Opportunities For Cults — Cult Expert Informs Regional School Committee” (3/12/87), and “It Often Starts With An Invitation To Tea — University Bible Fellowship Recruits Particularly Vulnerable Students.” In all these articles, the UBF is prominently mentioned as a cult-like group which targets college students and teenagers. The translated text of this series of articles can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/ga198508.en.htm.

From August-October 2002, the Bonner General-Anzeiger published another series of articles, this time dealing solely with allegations of cultic activities and abuses in the Bonn chapter of the UBF. The translated headlines of these articles are: “He Has A Position Of Totalitarian Power” (8/23/02), “Children Thankful For Beatings” (8/30/02), “ ‘Be Unobtrusive And Don’t Draw Negative Attention Anymore’ “ (10/8/02). The translated text of this series of articles can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/ga200208.en.htm.

On August 24 and October 7, 2002, the Süddeutsche Zeitung, a respected national newspaper with the largest circulation in Germany, also published articles about allegations of cultic activities in the Bonn chapter of the UBF. The translated headlines of these articles are: “ ‘Bible Friends’ Allegedly Abused Children — Public Prosecutor’s Office In Bonn Investigates The Leader Of The ‘University Bible Fellowship’ “ (8/24/02), “Unto Surrender — The ‘University Bible Fellowship’ Allegedly Turned Members Into Automatons” (8/24/02), and “ ‘Bible Friends’ Go Into Hiding” (10/7/02). Summaries of these articles can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/sz200208.en.htm.

In September 2002, in its Press Service No. 101 of 09/04/2002, the German evangelical news agency IDEA (www.idea.de) published a report titled “Bonn: Investigation of ‘University Bible Fellowship.’ “ The report covered the public investigation into allegations of cultic abuse in the Bonn chapter of the UBF. The report also covered the negative view of the UBF among mainstream evangelical organizations and churches in Germany. A summary of this report can be read at http://UBF-info.de/ext/idea200209.en.htm.

We believe that these neutral party observations about the UBF, as well as the many reports in the Christian and secular press about the UBF, constitute evidence of the true nature of this group. We also believe that these neutral party observations and reports are evidence that the UBF’s problems are systemic and not isolated to a few individuals or chapters (churches). Though the UBF’s public statements of doctrine may appear to be sound, and though the UBF’s spokespersons may profess to hold to orthodox-sounding Christian beliefs, there is no question based on the evidence, that the UBF’s extra-biblical teachings and practices have caused undeniable harm and brought disrepute to the faith. Yet, in spite of all this, the UBF’s leadership has consistently rejected calls for change from within and without to this day. The UBF’s being allowed to use the names of mainstream evangelical Christian institutions such as the National Association of Evangelicals to give themselves the appearance of legitimacy will only reduce the likelihood that the UBF’s leadership will see the need for change. We do not believe that the UBF, in its current state, is a group that the NAE should be associated with.

Therefore, we strongly urge the National Association of Evangelicals to revoke the UBF’s membership.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2010 Schafer Survey Letter

This is a letter from Joe Schafer, a prominent UBF leader, chapter director and long-time staff member. The letter was ignored by the leadership.

Date:                    November 15, 2010
Memo to:            UBF senior staff
From:                  Joe Schafer
Regarding:         Some UBF members’ concerns about the current state of the ministry

During the 1980’s and 1990’s, I could honestly say that most of the UBF members that I knew were joyful, enthusiastic, and proud to be in UBF.  Many were engaged in the ministry with excitement and zeal. But I do not see that happening now. Yes, there are still some growing disciples in UBF, some happy people, a few bright spots. But to my eyes, the overall spiritual atmosphere in UBF looks unlike anything I have ever seen, even during those periods when our ministry was under vigorous attack.

Over the last three years, external criticism of UBF seems to have died down. Many Christian leaders have befriended, accepted and defended us, and anti-UBF websites are becoming less active. Yet my impression is that morale among many UBF members is extremely low.

At a personal level, I am very happy with the way that my own life has been going. In 2010, God worked powerfully in my life, more than in any other year since I dedicated my life to Christ. He has brought me through a time of emotional and spiritual crisis which began in 2004, the year of my mother’s death. I had never really grieved over her, and that started a period of emotional turmoil and disconnectedness that lasted about five years.  But this year, through a painful process of realizing my weaknesses and then exposing them to others, I have been experiencing the reality of the gospel and the living presence of Jesus Christ in my life as I never had before. Some longstanding problems in my character, various kinds of emotional immaturity, are starting to be addressed. My personal ambitions and drive for achievement are vanishing. Out of my brokenness, my arrogance and pride are starting to dry up. For the first time in my life, I feel genuine love for God and genuine love for people flowing through my veins. I want to be with God. I have been praying through the Psalms, not because I think I should but because I actually want to. For the first time in 20+ years of marriage, my wife feels genuinely loved. My children are starting to feel genuinely loved. I am developing friendships and starting to connect to people, both Christians and non-Christians, in ways that I never have before. I have finally left the dry land of ideas and begun to swim in the vast ocean of relationships. My knowledge of God is no longer just doctrinal; now it is personal. I have a very, very long way to go. But God has been doing remarkable things for me, and for that I want to give him thanks. Glory be to God.

But since last year’s retreat in Delaware, numerous UBF members have confided in me that they are unhappy with the way that UBF is going. Being deeply concerned about what I was seeing and hearing, I wrote to about fifty UBF members in my social network of various ages and backgrounds. I asked them to answer five questions.

Question 1: What are the messages – the vision, direction, prayer topics, values, attitudes, etc. – that are actually being presented to you by UBF senior leaders? What are they trying to get you to do?

Question 2: How do you feel about these messages? Do they inspire you?

Question 3: What kind of message coming from senior leaders would truly inspire you, making you enthusiastic, happy, and truly wanting to remain in UBF for the foreseeable future

Question 4: What would it take to make UBF a place that you are proud of, a place to which you could enthusiastically invite Christian and non-Christian friends to come and see without hesitation, reservation or apology?

Question 5: If there were a message that you could communicate to UBF’s General Director and the leaders of North American UBF (or European UBF, or wherever you are), what would it be?

Thus far, approximately half of those who were contacted responded to my message, and more responses are still coming in.

This research is qualitative. I do not claim that the people who responded are representative of the entire UBF. They are people whom I personally know, admire and trust. They are not people who can just keep chugging along, doing the same things over and over as always. They are thinking about UBF and evaluating UBF, and they are deeply concerned about what is happening.

These are not troublemakers whose opinions might be written off because they “became difficult” and left our ministry.  These are current members who have dedicated a great deal of their lives to building, supporting and defending UBF. Our local UBF chapters are built upon their prayers, labor and financial support. Most of these people have kept quiet over the years and have never said anything in public against UBF or its leaders. They are reasonable, thoughtful, sincere Christians whom any pastor would be thrilled to have in his church. Some are chapter directors. Others are family members and close coworkers of UBF senior leaders. Many are actively engaged in student evangelism and discipleship. They are smart, talented, spiritually minded people who exhibit good character. Many have graduate and professional training. They include some of the best and brightest of our young Americans and second gens. These are the very kind of people that Dr. Samuel Lee would have sought to win over and inspire with a hope and vision that would capture their imagination.

These are people whom UBF cannot afford to lose.

Essentially everyone who responded to my questions expressed disillusionment and dissatisfaction about the overall direction and leadership of UBF. Some were resigned to the status quo, saying, “Well, no church is perfect.” Some were quite positive about their own local chapters and fellowships, but said that they are intentionally protecting their disciples from the wider UBF culture and staying away from regional and national events. One director wrote:

“We tend to ignore as many invitations from [regional] UBF as possible and quietly try and get on with things. For me that looks like trying to love my wife, enjoy my kids and enjoy bible study. We have a small band of brothers here and it makes for quite a fun time…”

Some are enduring because of their relationships with UBF members but are uncomfortable with UBF’s official activities and public persona:

“Group meetings do not usually inspire me. I am inspired however by relationships formed within UBF and bible studies…  I endure conferences and larger meetings (I do get things out of these meetings as well, but they are not comfortable for me). The other reason I can endure is because I have hope that things will change and I will be very proud of my ministry in every way some day. I believe this struggle is God’s refining fire for my character. I am very aware of group energy and awkwardness. I hate feeling awkward, but at UBF I have to feel that way all of the time.”

Others have been hoping and praying for change over the last decade but are growing weary, because promises by leaders of greater openness and change have failed to materialize:

“I am someone who feels committed to UBF. It’s true that it’s partially because my sheer existence is a product of UBF, and my 25 years of growth as a person and Christian has been so heavily influenced and shaped by UBF. It’s also because I see that God has done some truly incredible work through UBF for the past 50 years, and I believe that he can and wants to work through us in the future. But I do not want to spend the rest of my life in a UBF that looks the same in 30 years as it does today…. I’m not sure I want to raise children in UBF… I am tired of UBF pretending that it is the same organization that it was 30 or 40 years ago.”

Some have been unhappy for years, yet are still holding on. The wife of a chapter director says:

“I am personally discouraged.  Though I feel like our chapter is struggling to live before God and is overcoming some of these errors in teachings, there is still an influence from [the larger UBF chapter nearby].  And that influence is legalistic.  Personally, I have wanted to leave ubf many times.  However, my husband feels called to the ministry, so I absolutely want to support him. Second, my children have grown up in ubf and my teenager has built some strong friendships.  I want to help [my teenager] to worship with his friends, which [my teenager] does in ubf.  I saw the good influence of our hbf ministry on [my teenager] last summer when [my teenager] stood up and made a commitment to follow Jesus.  Also, I met Jesus in ubf, so I know I can’t just ignore that fact.”

And some are ready to give up:

“Drastic changes need to occur in the foundational thought of this ministry or I truly believe this ministry’s days are numbered. I can say in all honesty, if changes are not instantiated quickly and decidedly, my family, and numerous other families I am close to, will leave this ministry and not look back. Many of us feel like we are not serving God anymore and are very unhappy. There is no amount of Bible teaching, testimony writing, or repentance that will bring us back (as we have been told) as this is a ministry issue.”

In my communications with these members, I heard no talk whatsoever of splitting UBF. No one is stirring up trouble, forming factions or lining up behind any human leader. For various reasons, they are just unhappy with the status quo.

It is impossible to predict how many people are going leave UBF, or when they are going to leave. My best guess is that, if members perceive little change when the next General Director is announced next year, an exodus will begin. When valued members leave us, there is real or perceived betrayal. Significant relationships are broken, producing a great deal of pain and conflict; morale drops further, which may lead to even more departures.

Why is this happening? Using these members’ own words, I will attempt to summarize why they say they are unhappy with the current state and direction of UBF.

Some of this material will be painful to read. I was tempted to surround the negative quotations with lots of happy, positive messages, because I did not want anyone to think that I was complaining, bitter, angry or disrespectful. But I decided not to do that, because God’s servants ought to be willing to hear blunt messages and process them carefully and objectively. I hope that you will read this document with an open mind and prayerful heart to see if there is any truth in what these people are saying.

And as I relate these UBF members’ comments to you, please understand that I am not necessarily endorsing or agreeing with everything that they have said. These are their own words, expressing their own thoughts and feelings. I will present my own views later.

Wherever you see an ellipsis (…) in the quotations below, it is because I have omitted words, phrases or sentences that are irrelevant or might compromise the writer’s identity. I am not trying to mischaracterize people’s beliefs by taking their words out of context. You will have to trust me on that.

[Here are eight reasons the poll showed that moral is poor among UBF members]

Stated reason #1: UBF messages do not inspire them.

Many who attend UBF events are feeling apathetic, embarrassed, discouraged, and even angered by what they see and hear. One young leader who himself has been a main speaker at UBF conferences said this:

“I am decidedly not inspired by messages at UBF…  I constantly pick and choose what to accept from UBF messages and interpret what I think the speakers mean, forming my own conclusions. Often, I have to ignore offensive or insensitive comments, forgiving the speaker (because I like and respect him) and immediately preparing excuses for any non-UBFer who might have heard them.”

Many do not like how UBF messages sound. The speakers’ intonation, gestures and emotional expressions are unnatural, stilted, and forced. Some are still willing to give UBF messengers the benefit of the doubt and ascribe the awkwardness to differences in culture communication style, but others are not. Either way, this reveals a continued lack of awareness and sensitivity about how UBF messages are perceived by postmodern American audiences. Note that the strongest negative reactions are evoked not by Korean speakers (who are understandably from a different culture) but by North Americans (who should have no excuse). One young person wrote:

“We use the same phrases a lot, which to a new person or someone who has not had these “visions” revealed to them yet they feels plastic. “May North America become a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” is a good example. I hated saying this in church as a new Christian… I especially hated it when [my pastor] would make people say it. I had no idea what it meant and I didn’t have conviction about it. I was terrified at the end of every service that he would ask me to say it and I would have to tell him no. Thankfully he does not do that anymore and he never called on my when I felt this way… With the practice of the “repeat after me” or saying the same thing together all of the time it feels like they are trying to indoctrinate me with their ideas and ways before I necessarily believe them myself. I think this is part of what feels “cultish” about UBF to some people…  I know that their intentions are good but I still don’t like it for the sake of others.”

That person went on to say:

“I really don’t like it when messengers impersonate people in the passage, when they tell us to repeat after them a lot or ask, “what is the title of my message?”  or “what is the title of part 1?” To me it takes away from the seriousness of the word of God and makes us feel like children in kindergarten with an animated teacher. I have heard this feedback from almost everyone my age. I also dislike how messengers are trained to speak in the UBF way. I really, really don’t like this. I struggle with it so much. I wish they would help young messengers find their own voice and to speak from their own hearts.”

Another person said:

“Honestly new attendees are often scared or feel uncomfortable.  When I first came, I remember feeling insulted because it sounded like the messenger was speaking to me as if I were a child.  I understand there may be a large part of the audience that appreciates clear articulation and slow speech, but there should be some kind of assessment and happy medium… Also, I think having people turn to their neighbor and say something, like “Jesus forgives your sins” during a message is weird.”

Others find UBF messages amateurish, condescending, and sometimes offensive:

“i think that the ubf rhetoric is divisive and irresponsible. I do not feel comfortable bringing friends to ubf functions knowing i will have to apologize for offensive things that are said. I also do not find many of the programs intellectually stimulating and feel talked down to. I was disturbed to hear american non christians described as babies learning to walk or to use a spoon. i see an attitude  of  cultural  superiority  and  dismissiveness.  i   personally  think  christians  need  to understand and respect the often thoughtful beliefs of postmodern college students.  I feel like the analysis of postmodern and american culture is not a result of thinking critically or thinking at all, its just something people have always said and continue to say. the anti american rhetoric is often childish and offensive.   also, the oversimplification of controversial issues for messages turns me off and I’m sure any other people who are really seeking answers. mentions of male headship and homosexuality i have often noticed are presented tactlessly.”

A fruitful and faithful UBF leader wrote this:

“I do not say this to be disrespectful, but let me be honest. These days it is quite rare that I am ever inspired by the actual content of a message coming from any of our UBF senior leadership. Maybe this is more of a reflection of my spiritual callousness or immaturity. But frankly, I often have to turn  to  non-UBF  Christian  messages, both  ancient  and  contemporary—for a  higher level  of inspiration. What does inspire me is the “content” of the messenger—their lifestyle, their spirit, their personal commitment to Christ, the sacrificial decisions they have made in life, their utter spiritual nobility when it comes to radical commitment to Christ. And so I am often placed in a situation where I politely listen to a message from a UBF senior leader and try really hard to get myself inspired because I feel guilty that I’m not feeling inspired by a message from such a great servant of God… If such an uninspiring message came from a leader that I don’t personally respect anyway, then it wouldn’t be a problem because I would outright dismiss it and move on…”

When a spiritually inspiring message comes from a spiritually uninspiring life, I call that hypocrisy. But when a spiritually uninspiring message comes from a spiritually inspiring life, I call that a communication barrier. There is a great communication barrier facing UBF leadership and the younger generation today that goes beyond simple language or cultural issues.

And a house church director wrote:

“These messages are driving away many sensible people from UBF; not only so, we are losing many opportunities to plant the love of God in their hearts. Over time, these messages dry our blood and bone.”

Many have admitted that they are mentally reinterpreting and translating material being presented to make it more acceptable. For example, when listening to a presentation by Missionary XYZ, they may be thinking, “What Missionary XYZ just said sounds strange, and I don’t really agree with it. But I know Missionary XYZ, and I respect him, and I like him. I know that he is a dedicated servant of God, and I know that he means well. What he said is [something], but what he really means is [something else].” Sometimes they laugh to cover up the awkwardness of hearing messages they truly disagree with:

“I was aware that sometimes when a missionary says something that I consider ridiculous or totally  wrong  some  Americans just  laugh  very  loud  to  somehow try  to  minimize  what  the missionary said. But I always found that was a form of avoiding the fact that what the missionary (or shepherd for that matter) was saying was very wrong.”

Thus they continually apologize and cover for UBF speakers, laughing about them and reading between the lines to infer positive messages that were not actually being said.

Yet they do not openly voice their dissatisfaction, because the UBF culture discourages them from saying what they really think:

“Any negative comments are  rarely  if  ever viewed  constructively, but  as  being critical or  as complaining. So I don’t think I can recall anyone ever giving a bad message at our conferences, because all our messages are wonderful.”

Stated reason #2: The gospel is being assumed more than it is being proclaimed.

UBF leaders believe that this ministry is all preaching the gospel. However, some of our members no longer see the gospel at the front and center of our public messages and persona.

Yes, we still talk about the gospel. For example, at recent staff conference, we shouted, “I am not ashamed of the gospel.”  But  is  a  rich,  multifaceted  gospel  message  still  being  preached  in  UBF  with  fresh  understanding, inspiration, and passion?

Some do not think so. They perceive UBF messages as moralistic, full of exhortations and imperatives to do something, rather than conveying God’s unconditional grace and gospel love. One person wrote:

“The gospel is definitely assumed.   We’re told to preach the gospel, but how can we do that if we’ve never heard it properly preached and modeled?  We’re told to preach a message of grace, but the way in which that message is communicated to us is one of lawful imperative, i.e., you must preach this message of grace.  That’s hard to do when a graceful message is communicated in an ungraceful way… Too many imperatives for my taste. Must, must, must. Should, should, should… I’m easy to please–I’d like to hear a careful, thoughtful exposition of the biblical text, and a clear gospel message preached every Sunday with almost no imperatives (maybe just one).”

A young person says:

“I knew about Jesus and salvation and what not, but then the ACTUAL gospel itself was never clearly presented to me. What is the gospel? Do we all agree on what it is and why it is so important? Are we more about advancing the gospel or about the gospel itself? So sermons are heavily loaded with HOW to do it or that this is God’s purpose for man. How am I supposed to participate in sharing the gospel when I Don’t know what it is, why its so important and why its the good news?”

Another says:

“Show me how to preach the gospel, don’t tell me to do it.  In A Christmas Carol all the ghosts had to do was show Scrooge his avaricious life and how it hurt people and he was changed.  They didn’t have to say, “You must stop being a selfish, greedy old man.” They showed him. Show me.”

And another:

“[UBF] is focused on mission and human relationships-in the name of the gospel, but not by the power  of  the  gospel. It is focused on human  leadership,  obedience—especially to  elders, discipline… but not by the power of God. We say we are a gospel ministry, but in practice we mostly assume the gospel. I have made incredible friends through UBF… But in the end, human relationships cannot trump the gospel of Jesus…

Gospel ministry must be about the gospel – about Christ – not human relationships or human behavior. For many years, the strong bonds I have had with UBF leaders, shepherds, etc. enabled me to overlook the shortcomings and crazy stuff that goes on in our ministry. Our works-based ministry trained me well. My mind has been saturated with God’s word—which is good. But, I am working to build a new foundation in my heart – only on Christ – not on human activities or relationships.    You asked what kind of messages I want to hear. I am encouraged by gospel- focused  messages  —thinking  only  about  all  that  Christ  has  done.  Any  mention  of  what  I can/should do must be framed simply as my response to our gracious and loving Redeemer and King.

One concrete example I can share happened at the [regional] summer conference, in particular, during the life testimony sharing of the gospel. Each sharer was helped and prepared by a UBF leader. I was really bothered when I listened because each one shared how their lives changed significantly for  the  better  since  studying  the  Bible—grades improved,  life  improved, began fishing and teaching the Bible. It was implied that this change came about because of the gospel, but in fact, there was no mention of Christ or His work done. To me, this was a clear assumption of the gospel—but anyone listening to their story would assume it was the Bible study, shepherd, or human discipline that did it.  Not surprisingly, many people were ‘moved’ by the testimonies because of the dramatic stories. But, to my ears, many of the things that they said clearly indicated that they had very little understanding of Christ’s work done for them.”

And another:

“It seems like we teach the Bible as though we must do in order to get, rather than showing how much we already have in Christ, so that the doing is only a grateful response to grace, not a “means” to success and blessing in ministry and life… [Young people] are not inspired because they are not hearing about the gospel of what God has done for us by his mercy and grace. Instead, they are primarily hearing what they should do, must do, repent, decide, etc. Apart from the gospel of grace, nothing in the Christian life is sustainable.”

And another:

“I believe there is an emphasis on “doing things” that surpasses anything else in this ministry. i believe that it is out of proportion with the Bible verses that talk about the things we do vs. the things God does… I believe this emphasis not only places our hope on acts, and our understanding of strength on ourselves, it actually hurts people who are in different life frames (ie. parenthood, depression, and so on) by secluding them, making them feel worthless, piling guilt (to the point of paralysis) on their spirit. Because of these expectations, our ministry lacks the joy that should come from being a Christian – not from anything else other than having faith in God…. I find that those who do not hold this “acts based faith” are considered lazy and unrepentant, no matter what their heart is.”

And finally:

“I pray that the point of our ubf sermons and messages may be about the gospel, which is about what God has done for us in Christ, so that our hearts may be moved by the gospel of grace. So far, at every major conference or ubf event, the point or thrust doesn’t seem to be Jesus, but some business prayer topic: kingdom of priests and a holy nation, shepherd nation, 12 disciples, 1 Abraham of faith, be self-supporting, double the number, go fishing, feed sheep, etc.”

Stated reason #3: UBF is self-absorbed and inwardly focused, lifting itself up while ignoring the greater message of God’s kingdom and unity with the larger Body of Christ.

One young leader says:

“I get a lot of UBF-centered messages: doubling our ministry, drawing sheep, attending meetings, strengthening missionaries, raising leaders, establishing house churches… I have to make the addendum in my own head: “For the glory of God… to please Christ… because he commanded us to do it…  for God’s kingdom…  so that these people may be regenerated and healthy, etc.”  I have to remind myself WHY we want all these things.  Often, they are presented as ends unto themselves (and that is not inspiring).”

Another says:

“I think our ministry’s tendency to focus on our own distinctiveness and how this makes us better than other churches is unhealthy and in conflict with the way Jesus, Paul, and the NT generally conceive of the church… My honest view is that it should not particularly matter to us whether UBF as an organization continues to exist, as long as the people in the ministry follow Jesus with all their hearts. The church of Jesus is one, and no part of it is perfect, AND there is much that we can learn from the other parts of Jesus’ body…

I feel like it is a deep problem in our ministry that people focus so much on the ministry itself – the number of attendants to this or that – and as a result our lives become centered on building up this organization rather than on God. For a lot of people I think the two things are hardly distinguished. Doing the work of God = expanding UBF. As a result, the real relational element of Christian life – deep intimate fellowship and communion with God and each other which seems to be at the very core of what the Bible actually teaches – is largely absent / neglected.”

Public prayers at worship services are heavily focused on the blessing and expansion of UBF rather than simple glorification of Christ:

“What are we praying for?  When I see prayer topics on the website or I hear prayers uttered at worship service at the UBF headquarters here in [my chapter], it sounds like a big list of requests. Sometimes, I hear the prayer telling God something that is going on (such as a conference). Would this make any sense to someone who isn’t a Christian, or to someone who is simply visiting?  Hardly do I hear the name of Christ simply lifted up.  Hardly do I hear any indicatives about God’s Sovereignty, holiness, power, and wisdom.  The three prayer servants pray too long in [my chapter’s Sunday worship service].  The way they pray is unrecognizable from any biblical model that I’ve ever read.  In short, our prayers are not worshipful and deaden my worship on the Sabbath.”

A young person says:

“I’m proud of our ministry but it’s hard for me to say that about UBF as a whole. I’m afraid to bring my friends to YDC because of how heavily UBF it is, more than it might be a Christian environment….

We can learn SO much from other ministries and I’m sure vice versa. I think we’re worshipping UBF if we’re obsessed with maintaining our heritage rather than recognizing the need to maintain what Jesus wanted us to.”

Leaders, members, and publications speak of UBF in unrealistically positive, glowing terms. One chapter director wrote:

“Still many people take strong pride in UBF ministry as the “best and largest student ministry” which sent most missionaries and lose sight of the objective view.”

Another director wrote:

“…the glorification of UBF stuff leaves me cold… I was discussing this with my wife about an hour ago from reading a 50th year celebration thing. It’s the glory of man and methods not Jesus and his work.”

UBF leaders are said to be “global leaders” when in fact their lives seem narrowly focused on expanding UBF:

“I believe as long as people just remain in the frame of UBF they cannot be global leaders. Global leaders are those who work more than for organizational cause, those who have the global mind of God.”

A house church director says:

“Our vision is based on our leader(s) personal desires or goals. Our ministry direction is to increase our kingdom. We are building our own kingdom by using God for our own benefit. When we pray to make the USA a K of P and H N, the perception is political. In doing this, we twisted the scripture for the sake of our own prayer topic. We lost our family values in UBF. We are arrogant and we do not have a learning mind.”

Another person sees the creation of UBF Press as further glorification of UBF:

“I asked if UBF has a plan to use other publishing companies for publishing books or articles written by UBF leaders. The answer was No. The reason was otherwise, UBF press cannot be built up. Why could we not use other existing presses and publishing companies for publishing some materials? I hope UBF leaders will be more humble in acknowledging and learning God’s good work in other churches and organizations and be more connected to other members of the body of Christ.”

Stated reason #4: Heavy focus on increasing UBF numbers and participating in certain outward activities as the primary measure of fruitfulness and spiritual growth.

One young leader wrote:

“I believe I really do have a connection with our leaders on a lot of points regarding our ministry, but I would go about some things in a much different way than they do. For example I would never  motivate  people  to  invite  other  to  a  conference or  teach  the  bible  with  numbers or competition. To me that is de-motivating. It makes me feel terrible. Rather I would focus on connecting people with Jesus, meditate on how wonderful Jesus is, and make the meetings, conferences and worship services something our church members feel confident inviting people to. If people are right with God and our church is working towards reaching our specific demographics, mission will flow freely from that. I do realize this is all a lot easier said than done and I will say that the tactic of numbers has been drastically reduced at the center, but I do hope to see it continually move in that direction until it is eliminated from all public meetings. I think it is OK to talk about numbers among leaders, but I don’t like it when my bible students hear it.”

A student wrote:

“Throughout the [UBF event] and while in my own UBF ministry environment, I often sense an unhealthy obsession  with  productivity in  ministry… I  felt  very  uncomfortable when  I  saw  a respected leader in the church tell a Bible student that casually attends their SWS that he is “praying for him to give a testimony to grow spiritually”. This leader made absolutely no attempt to understand what is going on in this student’s life and made “giving a testimony” to be the clearest sign of spiritual growth. Similarly, as the only male college aged member of my ministry I feel unhealthy amounts of pressure to lead Bible studies, preside, feed sheep, start a club at my university and become a model for newcomers. I am asked to dress a specific way, rethink my doctrine, become more involved, etc. The final outcome of all this is that I am often sickened at the thought of ministry.”

From another young leader:

“Maybe a lot of this can be summed up by the main prayer topic that keeps getting emphasized: Double  our ministry.  My  honest  response  to  this  is – why  should  we  care  about  doubling something if we don’t care about the quality of what the thing getting doubled actually is. There are many areas we need to improve and discuss… and I think meeting the need of ensuring our communities are genuinely following Christ is vastly more important than just trying to grow these communities. I am sure that if we focus on loving Christ and each other, and making our communities truly Christ-centered and Christ-like, that God himself will take care of increasing numbers. This kind of emphasis on numerical prayer topics is something I haven’t said too much about, but which seems on reflection pretty wrong-headed.”

And a chapter director says:

“I remember many fellowship leaders in Chicago feeling restless and burdened on Saturday and Sunday because they had to count the number of worshipers. Some leaders were found counting the number during the worship service.  If we remove all the numbers from public prayers in UBF meetings, prayer could amount to almost nothing. Number gives people specific goals and a sense of achievement but the Holy Spirit works between numbers and beyond numbers. This is a sign of the immaturity of UBF ministry…

I hate hearing the prayer topic for double ministry. Without clearly explaining the meaning of this prayer  topic,  it  has  been  repeated  at  so  many  meetings and  conferences. It  only  gives  an impression that leaders are only interested in promoting UBF goals for the sake of UBF expansion, not addressing what God really wants and desires. Have the leaders even counted how far we have come for this prayer topic? Without reviewing and checking the current status, we just pray for double ministry by 2010. Now less than two months are left. I am curious what will the prayer topic in 2011. A leader should make a vision very clear based on the Scripture and God’s will.”

Stated reason #5: Obedience to  human leaders in  UBF is still expected and demanded, and discussion of problematic aspects of UBF is still not tolerated.

One leader writes:

“We have almost a papal view of leaders that is very disturbing to me and to many others I know….

Those who do exactly as they are told – achieve some sort of status that seems to be “holier” and more devoted to God. They are visibly favored by leaders, even to the point where there is a multitude of silent communication going on between leaders and others through the acts toward the “good ones”. While “the good ones” are so infatuated with pleasing others and looking good (under the guise of pleasing God), that their true intentions are quite transparent to others. Our ministry rewards compliance – and calls it humility. These are NOT the same thing.”

Another writes:

“UBF doesn’t seem to be a place where people can be themselves. If they don’t change into what we want them to be, they’re seen as problematic.”

And another:

“God has and will continue to do great things through this ministry. But we must also balance this with  healthy  self-criticism  and  an  honest  acknowledgment  of  our  mistakes.  Authority  gets abused. Wounds are inflicted. Even great and mature servants of God have their vices. We venerate people for being “exemplary” servants of God by emphasizing their good points and covering up their bad ones. But in order to foster a healthy environment for holistic growth, we need  to  encourage honesty and  humility, beginning with  the  leadership. Today’s generation craves authenticity and is suspicious of over-marketed ideas and people. They smell superficiality. The one place you DON’T want them to smell it is in church.”

And despite recent promises of more open communication, discussion of organizational problems isn’t happening:

“I long for more transparency and honesty when dealing with our church problems. What I mean is this: everyone would agree that UBF is not a perfect church. I assume that senior leaders would agree with that. And yet, I haven’t heard a single time a UBF leader openly and honestly talking about what is not perfect in our church. Never ever did I hear them truly putting their fingers into the painful wounds of the church in order to change issues. And every attempt to bring such things up [is] interpreted as an assault at the UBF authority and as disloyalty and disobedience. A truly inspiring message in  my eyes from senior leaders would be  to  willingly to  openly and honestly discuss our mistakes in the past and to discuss strategies on how to deal with these faults and to work on our weak points.”

Stated reason #6: In many ways, UBF still operates as a Korean church, maintaining a cultural climate that makes Americans uncomfortable.

America is an open-minded and pluralistic country, and Americans in UBF have long accommodated themselves to Korean-style practices and values. But after 30 years in North America, UBF continues to holds on to cultural practices that violate American sensibilities. About our communication style, one American writes:

“…even though we are an American ministry, we serve a large Korean and other than American community (those who are visiting and an array of bible students who are international students). I don’t  know if it is realistic to expect an American style of communication since so much of our congregation are not young Americans but it is frustrating because those are the people our leaders are telling me to bring.”

The primary message this person wants to communicate to UBF leadership:

“To N. American leaders: Let American UBF become American.”

Many of the respondents mentioned that they wish we would stop attaching honorific titles to members’ names (Dr., Missionary, Shepherd) because it sets up a hierarchy of persons; this still goes on in most fellowships and chapters. They continue to hear anti-American stereotypes in private conversations and even in public meetings:

“Because  America  is  a  superpower  nation,  many  people  who  don’t  identify  themselves  as American  have  no  qualms  pointing  out  its  flaws…  What  they  don’t  realize  is  that…  when Christians make comments such as, “Americans are lazy,” it is… passing judgment and bringing condemnation. I  identify myself as  American (not  [my ethnic group]-American or  [my racial group]-American) but 100% American and derogatory comments against my people–true or untrue, and from people who say they love and want to serve me–are just simply hurtful. The church is RESPONSIBLE for being culturally sensitive and welcoming to all people.”

Another leader says:

“Recently, when an American told a missionary that he likes American food rather than Korean food, he was regarded as “racist” against Koreans. When another American did not accept the Korean bride recommended to him, the comment was, “So, you don’t like Koreans?” This is surely our beloved missionaries’ cultural blind spot, or cultural superiority.”

And another longtime member writes:

“I NEVER considered myself a racist, but these days as our Korean brothers and sisters in Christ reveal their true selves and thinking about us, it becomes harder to bear and hold them in high regard.  If I made the comment: “Everyone knows that Koreans can’t drive well,” I wonder how I would be perceived.”

This person goes on to say that the unusual spectacle of American UBF members acting like Koreans was a major reason why the ministry didn’t grow:

“No one can doubt that we studied the Bible with many students over the last 18 years and only I remained.  Why?  I believe one reason was because we were Americans trying to bring people to Jesus AND into our Korean style church. We were Americans, acting like Koreans…”

Although a few Americans are considered to be national leaders, it appears that major decisions in North American UBF remain firmly in the hands of a Korean director and elders. Other Americans who have been in UBF for a long time (those who are roughly 30-45 years old) feel that they are being passed over and ignored. Meanwhile, younger Korean-American second gens are being groomed for leadership positions, because they seem more obedient and senior leaders are more comfortable working with them:

“I have a question: What was the purpose of raising American shepherds in the US, if we are simply maintaining Korean style ministry and leadership?  When I think about [the Schafers], the Wards, the Vucekovich’s, the Albrights’, the Rabchuk’s, what purpose was there? Was it to simply put an American face on the UBF ministry in the US?  When I had a discussion with [one American woman in UBF] a few years ago about my sense of abandonment by our ministry (that the focus went from raising disciples to raising the 2nd gens) she made the statement:  “Our generation in this ministry was told to sit down and just obey.”  This is so true.  I have enormous respect for these families mentioned because you all have remained faithfully for many years and I believe that God used it.  But leadership must listen to the cries of our hearts; we long to do good.  We long to please Jesus and do what is right for this next generation of Americans.  We long to see the preciousness of serving students with Bible study and in fellowship with them to thrive.  We want to be open to the Holy Spirit’s leading and not be stifled by methods or codes of leadership. I do not believe that it is only Americans who want to be free to serve; it is the human longing and desire; God’s image in us.”

Reason #7: UBF leaders continue to expect members to press on with fishing, one-to-one Bible study, and campus ministry, ignoring the demographic realities of who the members actually are, and ignoring other important ways of serving God.

There are many contradictions on display at UBF public events and worship services. The ministry is supposedly about students, but the audience to which speakers are playing is often the missionaries. One young person wrote:

“…because we have a college student ministry students are the most valuable and cared for people at the cost of other members. this is also paradoxical because i feel that all of the messages we receive are catered to missionaries not students. at various conferences and the harvest festival i wonder why students are invited at all when the program is clearly for the missionaries.”

Another wrote:

“If it is our goal to reach college students, people who are on the verge of their intellectual awakening, why are we (sorry for the generalization) not being thoughtful about how we handle the text and how we address real questions that students have, especially at conferences!! What is  the  purpose  of  our  conferences–outreach to  unconverted,  skeptical  college  students,  or refreshment for Christians?   I get a weird sense of both at our conferences (i.e., big summer conferences). I’d say, let’s pick one or the other.  This vagueness trickles into our worship services as well.  We say we want to reach college students, yet our worship services seem like tribal self congratulation. Let’s figure out who(m) we want to reach and head that way.  If we want to stay tribal, let’s do it right.   If we really want to reach skeptical, Buddhist, hedonist, or sleeping Christian college students, let’s model our worship services and conferences in such a way that they can feel welcomed and loved, without compromising the gospel.”

In UBF, fishing and one-to-one Bible teaching are promoted as the best and purest way to serve God, and other methods are not encouraged by senior leadership:

“Within the past couple of years, I have seen people take more initiative in other methods of evangelism and areas of serving, but I’m not sure these are fully supported by the UBF Senior Leaders.  For example, reaching out to people through movie nights, investing in friendships that might not always result in Bible study (though with a godly intent), going to art events, even hosting art events, having band performances with some Christian and some secular songs, book clubs, etc. may be innovative ways of reaching people for Christ, but I don’t feel that most senior staff at UBF wholeheartedly support these things.”

Christian activities not specifically aimed at campus evangelism are de-emphasized, to the point where non- students feel they are not being cared for and spiritually fed:

“I would be more inspired if we could send the message that we are also seeking a balance in ministry that can feed neglected parts of ourselves and of others.  For instance, I think it would be great to have young men’s Bible studies… married couples seminars, singles workshops, grief workshops, worship nights, old and young people mixers, etc.  I think we can learn from other churches in this particular area.  We as humans have the need to be spiritually fed by the Word of God in many different areas, and it is also very helpful to connect in relationships with other people who are going through similar things as yourself… it would be great to branch out a little more to serve the whole human being.”

Another writes:

“The standards in UBF are set so that other ways to serve the Lord are disregarded or even looked down upon. If our goals are success in evangelism and disciple-making then MAYBE these are the kinds of leaders we should look up to… I rarely am inspired by the message of having to go spread the good news. I don’t know why. I haven’t had that calling to be a standard UBF shepherd/missionary. To limit our goal to that is telling more than half the people in our ministry that they aren’t fit to be in UBF.”

Some say that UBF needs to do a better job of valuing and upholding members who are not students and who serve in ways other than Bible teaching, so that they do not feel marginalized. One leader points this out:

“Recent daily bread passage from 1 Corinthians taught us that the body of Christ comprises in different members, some visible and many more invisible. Regarding high those who do well in tangible  and  presentable  stuff  (teaching,  fishing,  raising  disciples)  would  make  the  body unhealthy and malfunctioning. Not too many people coming to UBF have a call to be Bible teachers and disciple makers. Expecting everybody to go fishing and become a Bible teacher is unbiblical and unrealistic. The body of Christ needs all kinds of members. Many people leave UBF or live as second or third class UBF people because they can’t find roles they can take other than being Bible teachers…”

“As long as UBF remains as a campus ministry and keeps its current name, it will not be a home for anyone, only for a certain group of people. As a church lack of heart and culture to welcome and accommodate anyone God  sends will  be  critical. I  strongly feel  that  UBF’s  name should be reexamined and leaders should be open minded for finding a more suitable name as a church that welcomes and serve anyone beyond university students. Leaders should be able to discern the evolving will of God upon the ministry. I don’t think UBF should remain as a student ministry because founders started with a student ministry. Ironically, non-university students outnumber university student in most chapters.”

But the strong expectations placed on members – many of whom have burdens and family situations that make it difficult to keep up with a rigorous plan of campus ministry – to continue to feed sheep at all costs becomes humiliating and crushing:

“…when I had three Bible students and heard that those we exemplified served 10 in a week, I felt constantly that what I was doing was not enough for God.   When I could not bring my Bible students to worship service, but they were faithfully studying the Bible each week, I still felt it was not good enough. And if my family could not handle a full time job, raising 4 children and serving 10 Bible students a week, daily bread and prayer, testimony writing, and fellowship meetings, that we are not leadership material.”

Reason #8: The older generation is now telling the younger generation what their spiritual heritage and vision are without consulting them and without seeking renewal from the Holy Spirit.

Many say that the senior leaders are assuming that the next generation should just stay the course and do exactly the same thing that the older generation did, ignoring the fact that the next generation is different and that the Holy Spirit may want to empower and use them in new ways. One director says:

“In theory and principle the seniors say they want to “empower” the next generation, but the reality  is  that  our  juniors  are  being  enforced  to  conform  to  a  pre-set,  pre-determined ubf structure, format, methodology, strategy.”

Another director says:

“I think many of UBF leaders do not understand what younger people are thinking and what they really want. Even YDC programs are often determined by a couple of Korean missionaries. Are they or we making serious efforts to understand them? There are not much dialogue between leaders and younger people. Channels through which their voices can be heard hardly exist. Seniors often impose their own vision and direction on younger people and expect them to follow their footsteps and continue what they have been dong instead of freeing them to follow the vision of God and the Guidance of the Holy Spirit.”

A younger person writes:

“The third issue I have is the simplistic assumption and faulty expectation that the vision of the first generation is absolutely identical to our vision. I respectfully disagree. John MacArthur was once talking about different generations in a church. (I forgot which sermon exactly). He said that the first generation’s task is to discover the truth. The 2nd generation’s task is to defend the truth. I don’t know how to apply this to UBF. But I agree with him that the mission and the task of the 2nd generation has to be a different one from the 1st generation. As [my pastor] put it: the first generation in UBF had been pioneers, breaking things down to make a path. It is the mission of the 2nd generation to become builders of what the first generation started. Our task should be to stabilize and to manage. This requires a distinct vision for the 2nd generation so that they can identify with it. So far, I haven’t heard a clear presentation of such a vision and I assume this might be the reason why many 2nd gens have problems to truly identify with UBF.”

Some see in UBF a lack of understanding of how the Holy Spirit worked in the past and how he wants to continue to work in the present. Past successes of UBF should be attributed to the work of the Holy Spirit, and not to specific UBF methods or practices:

“For UBF senior missionaries to claim that it was through their methods and hard work that Americans have been evangelized amazes me.  Without a doubt, my own conversion was through the power of the Holy Spirit.  Yes, God used [my Bible teacher’s] faithfulness, and the example of [my Bible teacher’s family] as a vehicle, but God did the work.”

Another person writes:

“Yes, we get bogged down in UBF-isms.  (I think we should abolish all titles.)  But more than that, I think that we are bogged down in our selected “curriculum” and traditions.   Many of those traditions are not wrong, but they can get in the way of movement of the Holy Spirit.  It’s difficult to say that, partly because I’m not sure what the movement of the Holy Spirit even looks like in a church.   I think that he moved powerfully 50 years ago at the beginning of UBF, but now it seems that UBF is trying to perpetuate that spirit in our church, today, and it’s no longer fresh.  From my cursory reading of church history, I gather that this happens a lot: God sends a powerful wave of inspiration, often involving a charismatic leader, and then, especially when that leader leaves, the movement tries to maintain itself using the tools that the leader used.  But the tools are not the point–the point is God revealing his changeless self in fresh, culturally-relevant ways.  We appear to be holding onto the tools (i.e. “manger ministry,” “one-to-ones,” “marriage by faith,” etc.), without listening to God about new directions.”

Young members are not picking up the vision that the senior leaders are trying to impose upon them:

“The general message that was communicated… to members of UBF today is that we need to get “back into the trenches”, so to speak, and continue to feed sheep and have Bible studies. I thought the emphasis was on the “what” (feeding sheep; 1 to  1 Bible Study), “how” (work harder), and “when” (now), but the “why” was largely ignored. I thought that the focus of the [specific event] and the UBF message in general have very little meaning to me if any because I am not actively involved in “fishing” and feel very much disconnected from UBF’s vision. While the messages may have reaffirmed and encouraged older members that are already on board with what was being taught, I can confidently say that the messages and workshops had very little meaning to most if not all the younger attendees. I thought this was fairly clear because the younger attendees were getting noticeably uncomfortable with what was being taught or increasingly disinterested. I had the opportunity to talk pretty intimately with one visitor and she mentioned that she thought it was “ironic that the [UBF event] was supposed to empower and inspire the next generation”. My guess is that younger attendees struggled to find a discussion about “fishing” strategies to be relevant if they don’t “fish” or if they’re struggling with other questions about faith, the Christian life, Christian community, etc.”

Another young person writes:

“Ultimately I believe [UBF leaders] are trying to get me to become a product of UBF and what UBF wants me to be. More than soldiers of Christ, it’s like we are supposed to be soldiers of UBF to maintain the spiritual legacy of the past. To be a second-generation missionary, bible teacher, fruitful with many sheep, to further advance the work of UBF to validate the authenticity of the ministry…

Whether it is through official UBF meetings or sunday services I just am bombarded with UBF more than God himself. Through daily bread blurbs we always go back to the way UBF does things. All in all, I just hear more about UBF practices and UBF lifestyle that are being promoted more than the bigger picture of what it means to be a Christian today…

It makes me uncomfortable and confused. I’m not inspired to be a product of UBF. I want to be a soldier of Christ and participate with others around the world to fight for the advancing of God’s kingdom here on earth, rather than create a well known ministry on earth. The emphasis on our unique practices is unsettling.”

Personal messages that these members would like to convey to UBF’s senior leaders

The responses that I received from these UBF members were not exclusively negative. For the most part, these members love UBF and have experienced God’s work among us. By and large, however, they feel that their voices have not yet been heard. In response to my Questions 3 and 5, here are some of the messages that they want to convey to senior leaders.

One person wrote:

“I truly appreciate Dr. Samuel Lee’s prayer topic, “A kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” I am certain it was God’s direct vision and word for us. While I still believe in the sentiment, I believe it is time to form a new prayer topic for our country. This doesn’t mean we throw this prayer topic out; rather, we need to pray to be inspired by the Holy Spirit and receive direction from God that builds on it. We should not cling to a prayer topic and stick to it solely out of respect and tradition for one person, but pray that WE may also be inspired as he was. A new prayer for a new generation that brings renewal for ALL people. We should move forward while still keeping a respectful eye on the past. Sometimes I feel that we are barely moving forward because we are working hard trying to make the past work for the present.

Basically, what would inspire me is: 1) inviting the Holy Spirit to reveal a fresh prayer topic that is biblical and relevant for the people of this country, 2) a humble acknowledgment that we still have  MUCH  to  learn  about  how  to  serve  American  students,  and  3)  an  openness  toward necessary change.”

Another wrote:

“Give some freedom to the Americans, focus less on numbers and more on spiritual growth, and know that this isn’t a perfect church.”

Another wrote:

“Be honest, open, and genuine.  Invite people (even just key young leaders) to a round table discussion of the things presented in this email…  Obviously we need to talk about them, and I agree that there is a pretty big disconnect.   But our disconnect is not irreconcilable; in fact, I believe if we talk it out we will realize that we are on the same page about most critical issues (go back to the Bible)!   If we all have open minds and are willing to compromise, maybe we can reconcile our differing viewpoints instead of just ignoring them or sweeping them under the rug (which both sides are guilty of).   Be willing to be frank about UBF’s weaknesses (yes, we have them), and look for ways to bring our small part of the body of Christ more in line with Christ’s mind and heart.”

A young person says:

“Please, for the sake of the ministry and for the sake of our Lord, be willing to let go of everything that is UBF. This isn’t saying that everything UBF is bad, but be WILLING to let go of what isn’t helping. I am not against fishing, one to one Bible study, testimony writing and what else is out there. I just believe that there is SO much more. We use these but don’t depend on these. We’re treading in shallow water when God is so much more deeper than we can imagine. If we’re willing to unlearn and relearn, then we’ll experience so much more of who God really is.”

Another says:

“I am really thankful and appreciative for your prayers for the next generation of leaders.  I know that you really love us, care about us, and want to see God use us in the future.  I know you want us to experience how powerfully God can use us.  I think it’s important for us- second gens/young people and missionaries- to trust each other and believe God is with us.  We young people can learn from the older generation of leaders, and I pray we will seek advice and wisdom from them. I also pray that the senior leaders may continue to pray for us and let us try new things and learn from our mistakes as well.  The young people I know feel sometimes discouraged or frustrated when they give feedback and are just dismissed.   For example, for conference message preparation, I think it’s really good that the senior leaders spend so much time and prayer for our conference messengers. But it might be helpful if the committee includes young people that can give feedback as well.  Maybe include young people in the messenger training committee, even if their role is simply to be a demographic “test” audience. I’m sure that many young people- myself included- need to also remember to have a humble attitude as well.  I believe more co-working between young and senior leaders could yield very positive results as they learn from each other through consistent collaboration.  When young people really feel their feedback is respected and valued- especially when they feel they didn’t yet “earn it” or not necessarily entitled to it- they may feel inspired.”

Another person mentions the treatment of women:

“My priority is for UBF to allow space for women leaders. I am glad that we are slowly allowing space for American and youth leadership… But I firmly believe that UBF sends a message that women are less valuable than men. UBF segregates the genders more often than Americans are used to, and UBF clearly honors men more than women. UBF also defaults to only allowing males to be visible and vocal, and I don’t understand why women can’t even be more often prayer servants, Bible  teachers, and  presiders, even  for those who  don’t believe women should be regular messengers. By not seeing/hearing women leaders, women are given the message that they cannot be leaders. They are given the message that they are not only less valued by their church community, but that they are less valued by God. Women in the church are statistically as abused (physically, mentally, sexually) as women “in the world.” And this is influenced by this attitude that women are inferior.”

And another who mentions women:

“Church often feels stale!  It often feels like we’re trying to recreate the culture of the young UBF, as it existed fifty years ago in Korea.   That includes many of the cultural differences that we Americans find offensive (like the unequal treatment of women).

We need to shed human traditions and cultivate a lifestyle of fellowship with God, in order to focus on his living Presence and maintain an ongoing attitude of worship, service, supplication, and love.”

This person wants leaders to follow the Holy Spirit and recast the identity of UBF not simply as a campus mission organization but as a church:

“UBF senior leaders should be able to see the place of UBF in God’s history and the limits of its role as a student ministry. It has been growing as a church but not well functioning as a church. Don’t be afraid of losing UBF heritage. We don’t have to regard the founders’ heritage. It was the Holy Spirit who started this ministry. If the Holy Spirit leads differently, we should be able to flexibly follow His guidance. Please, reconsider a different name for the ministry which can be more embracing more including different groups of people including our own children.”

And finally, here is an impassioned plea from a fruitful UBF leader:

I deeply long for senior leaders to tell me:  “Now it is your turn to lead. I trust you. Here are the “keys” to the UBF “car.” It is your turn to drive. No matter what, I trust that the God who allowed us to experience a great work of God in our generation will be the same God who will do a mighty work in your generation. And though I know you may do things differently than us, and though you may even do things that seem almost misguided and unfaithful to the UBF mission, I trust your heart. I trust that deep down you want to serve the Lord and advance the kingdom of God in your generation. I trust that the Spirit may do things in your time that seems the complete opposite way in which He had worked during my time. But I trust Jesus to be with you to the end of the age. Even if it means that ultimately UBF becomes less, may it be that Christ becomes greater in your ministry. Even if it means that the Lord chooses your generation to do things that initially go against our expectations, may Christ be glorified in whatever you do. But please remember this: We worked hard to build this foundation. We know we made mistakes along the way. But don’t be too eager to throw out the baby with the bath water. Keep what is from God – but everything else is disposable. All we ask is that you build upon the foundation in a way that is faithful to God’s kingdom purpose. Whatever happens, we will pray for you always and if you need guidance or advice, or even want us to serve in a capacity you think will be beneficial, then let us know. In the meantime, I’m going to go read some more books recommended to me by John Armstrong, and mostly spend my time praying for your ministry. Oh, and call me if you want me to babysit your children while you go fishing from time to time. Just kidding. Only if you decide that your ministry is going to go fishing on campus. No pressure. I’m not going to push you to go fishing or tell you what to do. But just in case you do want to go fishing, I will babysit your children…I love you no matter what. I’m proud of you no matter what. Now go in the grace of Jesus, and may God help you accomplish for His Kingdom more than you can ask or even imagine. The God who calls you is faithful and He will do it!”

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail